Skip to content

EffectiVenEss of a Rehabilitation Treatment With Nordic Walking in obEse or oveRweight Patients

EffectiVenEss of a Rehabilitation Treatment With Nordic Walking in obEse or oveRweight Diabetic patiEnts With Cardiovascular Disease. The VENERE Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05987410
Acronym
VENERE
Enrollment
105
Registered
2023-08-14
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabete Type 2, Overweight and Obesity

Keywords

Nordic Walking (NW), cardiovascular disease, diabetes Type II, overweight, obesity, Six Minute Walking Test (6MWT), adherence, rehabilitation

Brief summary

Nordic Walking (NW) is a biomechanically correct walking technique that originated in Finland in the 1930s as an off-season training method for cross-country skiers. In the NW, the use of special sticks is combined with "conventional" walking: this involves a greater caloric expenditure, with an energy consumption higher by 20-30% compared to walking without sticks, and also toning of the upper part of the body, in particular triceps, shoulders and back, and the involvement of about 90% of the body's muscles, while maintaining a reduced load on ligaments and joints (Baek & Ha, 2021). The NW acts simultaneously and effectively on different components of fitness: coordination, endurance, strength, and mobility. It does not require sudden accelerations and is based on a technique that is easy to learn (with the help of an instructor), especially as regards maintaining correct posture. Finally, in addition to the cardiovascular benefits, NW has also been shown to effectively reduce the risk of falls in the elderly. The study is a single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT), with a three-parallel-arm design, open-label. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy (in terms of cardiovascular performance), safety, and adherence (in terms of dropout rate) to the exercise prescription after 6 and 12 months follow-up of a 3-month NW intervention compared with standard rehabilitation training (SR, 3 months) in obese/overweight diabetic patients with cardiovascular (CV) complications. The study will enroll in parallel a control group that can access only generic cardiological counseling with a prescription for unsupervised home exercise.

Interventions

OTHERNordic Walking (NW)

The experimental group will carry out NW sessions three times a week for 12 weeks, supervised by a NW instructor and under the control of a cardiologist. The duration of each NW session will initially be 90 minutes: 10 minutes of warm-up, 60 of NW, and 15 minutes of cool-down. The intensity of the course will be gradually increased each week, starting at 70 to 85% of the heart rate (HR) reserve. It will also receive indications relating to a balanced diet plan which proposes a moderate (300-400 KCal) daily caloric restriction concerning the usual caloric expenditure, estimated based on initial body composition measurements.

The second group will follow a standard rehabilitation program with an initial cardiological prescription and supervised by physiotherapists, carried out 5 days a week with sessions lasting 40 minutes, including 5 minutes of warm-up up), 30 min of aerobic physical activity on a conveyor belt or cycle ergometer and 5 minutes of cooling down (cool down). The intensity of your aerobic activity will gradually increase each week, starting at 70 to 85% of HR reserve. It will also receive indications relating to a balanced diet plan which proposes a moderate (300-400 KCal) daily caloric restriction concerning the usual caloric expenditure, estimated based on initial body composition measurements.

OTHERCardiological Counselling (CC)

The third group of participants will receive cardiological counselling with indications of unsupervised aerobic physical activity. The group will also receive indications relating to a balanced diet plan which proposes a moderate (300-400 KCal) daily caloric restriction concerning the usual caloric expenditure, estimated based on initial body composition measurements.

Sponsors

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a single-center, randomized controlled intervention study with three parallel arms (NW=Nordic Walking, SR=standard rehabilitation and CG=control group), open label.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- overweight \[Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m2\] or obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) adult patients with diabetes mellitus and with a recent cardiovascular event and/or coronary revascularization in the previous three months

Exclusion criteria

* inability to walk independently and constantly; * acute joint or spine pathologies that make movement impossible; * the presence of dementia as approved by consultation of the patient's medical record and/or administration of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) test ≤ 15.5 (Nasreddine et al., 2005); * chemotherapy 6 months before surgery; * advanced renal failure; * acute cardiovascular event \< 3 months (unstable angina, AMI with FE \<40%, arrhythmias, valvular disease, intracerebral/subdural haemorrhage, uncontrolled AI); * home oxygen therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) \[excluding Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)\].

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Six Minute Walking Test (6MWT) distance in metersAn average of 6 monthsAssess distance in meters, determined by the Six Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in the Nordic Walking (NW) group compared to the Standard Rehabilitation (SR) and Control (CG) Groups at baseline (T0), the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1), and after 3 months of observation (T2)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AdherenceThrough intervention completion, an average of 3 monthsMonitoring of adherence to the intervention considering the number of sessions of the treatment \[Nordic Walking (NW); Standard Rehabilitation (SR) or Control Group (CG) intervention\] attended during the 3 months.
AnxietyAn average of 6 monthsTo verify the effectiveness of the interventions in reducing the levels of anxiety as detected by The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) in the Nordic Walking (NW) group compared to the Standard Rehabilitation (SR) and Control (CG) Groups at baseline (T0), the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1), and after 3 months of observation (T2). The following cut-offs correlate with level of anxiety severity: Score 0-4: Minimal Anxiety; Score 5-9: Mild Anxiety; Score 10-14: Moderate Anxiety; Score greater than 15: Severe Anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006).
DepressionAn average of 6 monthsTo verify the effectiveness of the interventions in reducing the levels of depression as detected by The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in the Nordic Walking (NW) group compared to the Standard Rehabilitation (SR) and Control (CG) Groups at baseline (T0), the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1), and after 3 months of observation (T2). Regarding severity, PHQ-9 comprises five categories, where a cut-off point of 0-4 indicates no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depressive symptoms, 10-14 moderate depressive symptoms, 15-19 moderately-severe depressive symptoms, and 20-27 severe depressive symptoms (Kroenke and Spitzer, 2002).
The Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12)An average of 12 monthsTo verify the effectiveness of the interventions in improving the levels of Quality of Life detected thanks to The Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) (Ware et al., 2000) in the Nordic Walking (NW) group compared to the Standard Rehabilitation (SR) and Control (CG) Groups at baseline (T0), the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1), after 3 months of observation (T2), 12 months (T3).
Variation in Body Mass Index (BMI)An average of 12 monthsTo verify the effectiveness of the interventions in improving the Body Mass Index (BMI) in the Nordic Walking (NW) group compared to the Standard Rehabilitation (SR) and Control (CG) Groups at baseline (T0), the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1), after 3 months of observation (T2), 12 months (T3). An improvement of at least 10% in BMI is considered significant.
Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2)An average of 6 monthsAssess increasing in Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2) in the Nordic Walking (NW) group compared to the Standard Rehabilitation (SR) and Control (CG) Groups group at baseline (T0), the end of the rehabilitation treatment (T1), and after 3 months of observation (T2)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTNuccia Morici, MD, Ph.D.
nmorici@dongnocchi.it3206359064
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnna Torri, MD

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026