Skip to content

Peri-Capsular Nerve Group and Supra Inguinal Fascia Iliaca BLOCK for Analgesia and Ease of Positioning During Neuraxial Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Patients

Comparison Between Peri-Capsular Nerve Group and Supra Inguinal Fascia Iliaca BLOCK for Analgesia and Ease of Positioning During Neuraxial Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05987254
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-08-14
Start date
2023-08-10
Completion date
2024-03-30
Last updated
2024-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Anesthesia, Hip Fractures

Brief summary

Severe pain associated with fractured hip often results in difficulty during positioning for spinal anesthesia (SA). Among many regional analgesic techniques, the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is popular among anesthesiologists to provide immediate as well as postoperative analgesia in hip fractures. Recently, the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block has been proposed to provide effective analgesia in hip fracture patients. However, comparative studies between PENG and FICB are lacking.

Interventions

ultrasound guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block

PROCEDUREpericapsular nerve group block

ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group block

Sponsors

Benha University
CollaboratorOTHER
Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 40 years and above with hip fracture with persistent pain and scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA)

Exclusion criteria

* any contraindications to SA or peripheral nerve blocks, history of ischaemic heart disease, patients on opioids for chronic pain and patients with significant cognitive impairment. Patients who had no pain while sitting by themselves (resting pain less than 4 on NRS) for SA without any support were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRS30 minute postoperativeIn a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10, that fits best to their pain intensity. Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible'.
The ease of spinal positioning (EOSP)Thirty minutes after the blocksThe ease of spinal positioning (EOSP) was assessed on the scale of 0-3 (0 = unable to position, 1 = patient had abnormal posturing due to pain and required support for positioning, 2 = mild discomfort but does not require support for positioning, 3 = optimal condition where the patient was able to position himself without pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
amount of tramadol used24 hours postoperativelynumber of rescue doses of tramadol will be recorded

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026