Skip to content

Comparison of Mirror Therapy and Modified Constrain Induced Movement Therapy on Risk of Fall, Balance and Gait in Stroke

Comparison of Mirror Therapy and Modified Constrain Induced Movement Therapy on Risk of Fall, Balance and Gait in Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05985603
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-08-14
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2024-02-15
Last updated
2025-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

CIMT, Mirror Therapy

Brief summary

There will be a difference between modified constraint induced movement therapy and Mirror Therapy on lower limb for risk of fall, balance and gait in stroke patients.

Interventions

In this group of patients CIMT technique will be used for treatment

patient will perform movements in semi-reclined and sitting positions with the mirror placed between the two lower extremities.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A Hemiplegia due to unilateral stroke * Sub-acute and chronic stroke * Stroke survivors between 21 and 70 years old will be recruited * Both genders * NIH Stroke scale below 20 * Mini-Mental State Examination above 24 * Function in Sitting Test (FIST) above 42/56

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with depression who will be unable to cooperate during treatment * Patients who cannot perform the active movement of limb due to prestroke muscoskeletal problems * Cardiopulmonary diseases which could hinder their ability to participate in rehabilitation * Spasticity of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) II or higher * Patients with Any neuron disease and Patients with lower-limb impairment caused by other neurological diseases or inability to comply with study protocol will be excluded. * Visual and auditory abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NIH Stroke Scale - NIHSS2,4,8 weekIt comprises of 15 items with each having responses scored on a 0-4 points scale. The overall score ranges from 0-42 points with higher scores specifying pronounced neurological deficits
Mini-mental state examination2,4,8 weekCognitive status by the mini-mental state examination (mmse)Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a tool that can quickly diagnose if a person suffers from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) through answering questions in different cognitive domains. The MMSE demonstrates moderately high levels of reliability. It has been reported to be internally consistent
POMA2,4,8 weekAfter interventions POMA for assessing risk of fall will be used. The POMA is used to examine balance and mobility in the elderly (Tinetti 1986). This examination tool consists of the balance subscale (9 items, 16 points) and gait subscale (8 items, 12 points), totaling 28 points.
Berg balance scale2,4,8 weekA five-point scale, ranging from 0-4. 0 indicates the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total Score = 0-56. Score of 41-56 = low fall risk, 21-40 = medium fall risk, 0-20 = high fall risk.
10 Meter walk test / 10mwt2,4,8 weekCalculating Gait Speed - total distance/time. For example: if you did a 10-meter gait speed test and it took you 7 seconds, the equation would like: 10 meters / 7 seconds = 1.4 meters per second. The 10MWT intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were good (ICC between 0.76 until 0.9) and excellent (ICC \> 0.9), respectively. The minimal detectable change for intra-rater reliability was 0.188 m/s.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026