Deafness Neurosensory
Conditions
Keywords
Spectrum of auditory neuropathy, speech enhancement, intelligibility, denoising methods, hearing loss
Brief summary
Individuals with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders (ANSD) represent 1-10% of adults with hearing loss. These individuals have little or no benefit from current hearing aids because ANSD is a continuum of hearing impairments due to synaptic or neural dysfunction in the peripheral and central parts of the auditory pathways, which impairs temporal information processing without necessarily affecting auditory sensitivity. There is a need to find ad-hoc denoising methods, based on the expert knowledge of audiologists, to improve the noise comprehension performance of these patients. Implemented denoising methods, based on artificial intelligence, will also greatly benefit more standard hearing loss cases.
Detailed description
Longitudinal study consisting of multiple visits with multiple examinations over a total duration of approximately 3 years per ANSD participant and 1 year per normal hearing participant. * normal hearing participant : year 1 : Inclusion visit, Phenotyping visit (Audiological tests), Follow-up Visit 1 (Noise Comprehension Tests) * ANSD participant : year 1 : Inclusion visit, Phenotyping visit (Audiological tests), Follow-up Visit 1 (Noise Comprehension Tests) year 2 : Follow-up Visit 2 (Noise Comprehension Tests) year 3 : Follow-up Visit 3 (Noise Comprehension Tests)
Interventions
OTHERaudiological measurements
audiological measurements
OTHERObjective and subjective audiological measurements
Objective and subjective audiological measurements
OTHEREvaluation of the denoising methods REFINED
Evaluation of the denoising methods REFINED
Sponsors
Institut Pasteur
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
For all participants: * Age greater than or equal to 18 years, * French mother tongue, * Have an average tonal hearing loss (calculated according to the BIAP method) \< 30 dB HL, on headphones, for each ear, * Be professionally active, not be pre-retired and not be unemployed * Be affiliated with a social security plan, For participants with TSNA: \- Have degraded comprehension in noise (threshold of Intelligibility in Noise \> 3 dB compared to the norm). For controls: \- Have normal comprehension in noise (Intelligibility in Noise threshold ≤ 3 dB from the norm).
Exclusion criteria
For all participants: * Have a conductive or mixed hearing loss, which is when the hearing loss affects both the outer and/or middle ear and the inner ear. * Have an asymmetric hearing loss, i.e. a difference in average hearing loss between the left and right ear greater than 30 dB, * Have sequelae of ear infections and/or a history of ENT disease that permanently affects hearing (vestibular schwannoma, Meniere's disease, sudden or fluctuating deafness, congenital hypoacusis) * Being under guardianship, * Being deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, or being subject to legal protection.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of percentage of words correctly repeated by participants (ANSD and controls) | 3 years | Evaluate intelligibility, i.e. the percentage of words correctly repeated, for different speech and noise conditions. Tests will be repeated with and without application of speech enhancement methods to the sound. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Auditory Brain Response (ABRs) | 3 years | Electrical activity of auditoral pathways, from the auditory nerve to the brain, in response to sound stimuli. |
| Percentage of words correctly repeated by participants with different angles of separation of speech and noises sources | 3 years | Evaluate intelligibility and performance of source localisation for different angles of separation of speech and noises sources |
| Percentage of phonemes correctly repeated by participants (Verbo-Frequential Audiometry in the presence of calibrated noise: the DODELE AVfB test) | 3 years | Evaluate speech perception in noise with phonemes as testing speech |
| Percentage of words correctly repeated by participants at different sound level of noise | 3 years | Assess intelligibility in noise. Vocal tests will be repeated with and without tactile cues. |
| Myogenic vestibular evoked potentials (cervical VEMP or c-VEMP). | 3 years | c-VEMP assesses the vestibular function through saccular and inferior vestibular nerve function performances. The collected parameters of c-VEMP testing include c-VEMP threshold, the latencies of the initial positivity (p1) and negativity (n1), and the p1-n1 inter-amplitude. We will collect these parameters and assess differences in controls vs. ANSDs. |
| Subjective evaluation of listening comfort using a visual analog scale | 3 years | This self-assessment involves placing a cursor on a scale ranging from very uncomfortable to very comfortable using a scale ranging from 0 to 10. |
| Subjective evaluation of listening efficiency using a visual analog scale | 3 years | This self-assessment involves placing a cursor on a scale ranging from very inefficient to very efficient using a scale ranging from 0 to 10. |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactMarta Campi, PhD
Backup ContactPaul Avan, MD
Outcome results
None listed