Spinal Cord Injuries
Conditions
Keywords
Spinal Cord, motor neuron, Spasticity
Brief summary
Reciprocal inhibition is a medulla spinalis control mechanism that facilitates motor activities in healthy people. As the agonist muscle contracts, the antagonist muscle is inhibited so that the agonist action can take place properly. In the literature, there are studies showing that in patients with upper motor neuron lesions, this reverses, and reciprocal facilitation occurs instead of inhibition. However, there is no clear situation in this regard, there is a need for more methodologically sound studies. Our aim in this study is to investigate the presence of reciprocal facilitation in patients with spinal cord lesions (SCL).
Detailed description
Reciprocal inhibition is a spinal segmental control mechanism that facilitates motor activities in healthy people and is also used in treating spasticity. Considering the current literature, there are some studies claiming that this is reversed in patients with upper motor neuron lesions and that there is reciprocal facilitation instead of inhibition. However, the proposed evidence is not convincing. Our aim in this study was to investigate the presence of reciprocal facilitation in detail in patients with upper motor neuron lesions. This study was conducted in five patients with spinal cord lesions and five healthy individuals. Both the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles of the cases were recorded using surface and multi-motor unit electromyography (EMG) electrodes. To elicit an H reflex in the soleus muscle, an electric current was delivered through the popliteal fossa using the monopolar technique. The Achilles tendon was tapped with the reflex hammer to elicit a T reflex. Since the H-reflex and T-reflex responses were detected in the tibialis anterior muscle surface and multi-motor unit EMG recordings, the findings were evaluated as direct stimulation, cross-talk, and reciprocal facilitation. Methodologically, This research aimed to be a guiding study for future studies.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTendon tap
While examining the T reflex, the ankle was held passively in neutral, dorsiflexion and plantar flexion positions by the investigator.
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTibial nerve stimulation
H-reflex responses were examined by tibial nerve stimulation
Sponsors
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Group I. Spinal cord injuries Group II. Healthy Control
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with spinal cord injury between the ages of 18-60 * A minimum of 6 months of SCL history * Soleus spasticity
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with premorbid neuromuscular disease * History of autonomic dysreflexia * Patients in the spinal shock period * Those who have a coronavirus disease clinic * Less than 2 hours sitting tolerance
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Inhibition | up to 2 weeks | H reflex and T reflex tests were performed in the soleus and tibialis anterior muscle, and it was evaluated whether there was reciprocal inhibition in the tibialis anterior muscle. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| H-reflex | up to 2 weeks | Electric current was delivered through the popliteal fossa to tibial nerve for eliciting the soleus H-reflex |
| T-reflex | up to 2 weeks | The Achilles tendon was hit with using a reflex hammer to elicit the soleus T-reflex. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed