Skip to content

Elimination of Odor and Treatment of Malodorous Recalcitrant Wounds by Using Supraz and PRP-FG Versus Standard of Care

Repairing Gel (Supraz) and Platelet-rich Plasma-Fibrin Glue (PRP-FG) in Eliminating Odor and Healing the Malodorous Chronic Wounds Versus Standard of Care

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05983302
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-08-09
Start date
2023-08-20
Completion date
2027-03-20
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

Platelet-Rich Plasma-Fibrin Glue, Repairing Gel, Chronic Wounds, Malodorous, Recalcitrant

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to eliminate the malodorous of chronic wound and increase the chance of the healing of recalcitrant wounds by using the repairing gel (supraz gel) which has the approved components in wound healing and platelet-rich plasma-fibrin glue.

Detailed description

The current study assesses the effects of platelet-rich plasma-fibrin glue (PRP-FG) along with the use of the repairing gel which has the approved components on wound healing in patients with chronic wounds and to eliminate the malodorous of chronic wound. This randomized controlled trial is performed on patients with chronic wounds. Patients will be treated with repairing gel (supraz gel) plus PRP-FG dressing (intervention group) or only Supraz gel (intervention group) or only PRP-FG dressing (intervention group) every 48 hours for 8 weeks versus standard of care of treatment (control group: irrigation of wound by normal saline 0.9%).

Interventions

DRUGPlatelet-Rich Plasma-Fibrin Glue

The first intervention group includes 10 patients with chronic wounds who, despite common treatment, will be undergone PRP-FG intervention for 8 weeks.

DRUGRepairing Gel

The second intervention group includes 10 patients with chronic wounds who, despite common treatment, will be undergone the repairing gel with approved wound healing components in the form of gel for 8 weeks.

DRUGRepairing Gel and Platelet-Rich Plasma-Fibrin Glue

The third intervention group includes 10 patients with chronic wounds who, despite common treatment, will be undergone the repairing gel with approved wound healing components in the form of gel and PRP-FG for 8 weeks.

OTHERClassical wound irrigation (control)

For 10 patients with chronic wounds, only the classical wound irrigation by normal saline will be continued for 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Having a single wound on the body that has been at least 3 months old and has not been repaired by wound irrigation with normal saline and changing the dressing * Having a body mass index of 18-35 * Sign the informed consent by the patient

Exclusion criteria

* Having concurrent diseases that may cause problems in wound healing, such as cancers, vasculitis, kidney and liver failure, and heart failure * Taking certain drugs that may interfere with wound healing, such as corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, and cytotoxic agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with infectionAt the beginning of the study (0 day) and at the end of the eighth week of the intervention (8 weeks)A swab culture: Identify a small area (1 cm) of clean viable tissue and rotate the swab on it for 5 seconds while applying enough pressure to produce exudate and culture it to detect bacteria.
Results of the SF36 questionnaire at Month 2Month 2The SF-36 questionnaire is a quality-of-life questionnaire that includes 36 questions divided into 8 different categories (physical functioning, limitations due to physical condition, physical pain, perceived health, vitality, social functioning or well-being, limitations due to mental condition, mental health). These 8 dimensions are used to calculate two scores on the quality of life of individuals: the physical composite score and the mental composite score. The higher the score, the greater the capacity. It is self-administered and takes less than 10 minutes. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. The French version has been validated and has satisfactory psychometric properties. Score from 0 to 100.
Results of the SF36 questionnaire at inclusionDay 0The SF-36 questionnaire is a quality-of-life questionnaire that includes 36 questions divided into 8 different categories (physical functioning, limitations due to physical condition, physical pain, perceived health, vitality, social functioning or well-being, limitations due to mental condition, mental health). These 8 dimensions are used to calculate two scores on the quality of life of individuals: the physical composite score and the mental composite score. The higher the score, the greater the capacity. It is self-administered and takes less than 10 minutes. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. The French version has been validated and has satisfactory psychometric properties. Score from 0 to 100.
Wound Odor ChangeAt the beginning of the study (0 day) and at the end of the eighth week of the intervention (8 weeks)Change from Baseline Wound Odor intensity at 2 months will be assessed by the nurse using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 (perceived odor).
Wound Size ChangeAt the beginning of the study (0 day) and at the end of the eighth week of the intervention (8 weeks)Change from Baseline Wound Size (length and width) at 2 months will be assessed in digital images taken of the wound.
Visual Analog Scale changes for pain assessmentEvery 48 hours for 8 weeksPain will be evaluated by the visual analog scale system (VAS) which assesses changes in pain via a continuous measurement instrument. The score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) between the no-pain anchor to the point that the patient marks, providing a range of scores from 0 - 10. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Duration of recovery8 weeksThe duration of recovery, which is the number of days it will be taken for the wound to heal.
Change in the systemic inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP)At the beginning of the study (0 day) and at the end of the eighth week of the intervention (8 weeks)C-reactive protein (CRP)
Change in systemic inflammatory marker erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)At the beginning of the study (0 day) and at the end of the eighth week of the intervention (8 weeks)erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
Change in systemic inflammatory marker Interleukin 6 (IL-6)At the beginning of the study (0 day) and at the end of the eighth week of the intervention (8 weeks)Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage rate of re-epithelializationParticipants will be followed for the duration of 8 weeksPictures taken of the wound site every other day will be analyzed using imaging software for the size of the wound. The percentage rate will be calculated from this.

Countries

Iran

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDaryoush Hamidi Alamdari, Ph.D

Surgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDaryoush Hamidi Alamdari

Surgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026