Skip to content

Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Xience Skypoint Stents in Routine Clinical Practice

a Non-randomized, Prospective, Open-label Registry to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of XIENCE Skypoint™ Stents Versus Other DESs in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05981911
Acronym
IRIS Skypoint
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2023-08-08
Start date
2023-12-14
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

drug eluting stent, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of XIENCE Skypoint stents in comparison to other drug-eluting stents (DES) in real-world practice.

Interventions

DEVICEXIENCE Skypoint™ stent

Percutaneous coronary intervention with Xience-Skypoint™ stent

Sponsors

CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Seung-Jung Park
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients ≥ 19 years old 2. Patients receiving Xience-Skypoint™ stents. 3. The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with a mixture of other DESs 2. Terminal illness with life expectancy \<1 year 3. Patients with cardiogenic shock

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the composite event rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemic-driven Target- Vessel Revascularization (TVR)12 monthsthe composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemic-driven Target- Vessel Revascularization (TVR) at 12 months post procedure. A composite endpoint is an endpoint that is a combination of multiple clinical endpoints. An event is considered to have occurred if any one of several different events is observed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the event rate of cardiac death5 years
the event rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction5 years
the composite event rate of death, or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI)5 years
the composite event rate of cardiac death, or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI)5 years
the event rate of all cause death5 years
the event rate of Target- lesion Revascularization (TLR)5 years
the event rate of stent thrombosis5 yearsaccording to an Academic Research Consortium (ARC) criteria
the event rate of stroke5 years
the event rate of Procedural success7 days(defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of \<30% by visual estimation, without the occurrence of death, Q-wave MI, or urgent revascularization during the index hospitalization.
the event rate of Target- Vessel Revascularization (TVR)5 years

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJung-hee Ham, Project manager
cvcrc5@amc.seoul.kr82230104728

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026