Dentin Hypersensitivity, Non-carious Cervical Lesions, Bioactive Glass Air Polishing, S-PRG
Conditions
Brief summary
This trial is test the dentin hypersenstivity using Giomer based Varnish versus Bioactive glass air polishing system in patients with non-cervical lesions.
Detailed description
To investigate the clinical effectiveness of Giomer based varnish versus Bioactive glass air polishing System in the management of dentin hypersensitivity and tooth color change in the cervical lesions. P:Patient/Population: Middle aged patients complaining of cervical dentin hypersensitivity. I: Giomer varnish containing surface pre-reacted glass fillers. C: Bio-active glass air polishing system: O:Dentin Hypersenstivity (Primary Outcome) was assessed by three different stimuli (evaporative , thermal and tactile) . O: Color Change (Secondary Outcome). T: Baseline, T1, T2, T3. S:a randomized clinical trial.
Interventions
OTHERGiomer varnish containing surface pre-reacted glass fillers
Giomer varnish (PRG barrier coat) will used as the intervention agent in this study. , Giomer is considered as a hybrid material between the resins modified glass ionomers and the composite resins. It is composed of 45% Sio2, 24.5% Na2O, 24.5% Ca O and 6% P2O5 . The presence of sodium is very important due to its bioactivity while the phosphate is responsible for the degree of degradation and formation of apatite. Based on this composition, giomer has several clinical applications in implant, periodontics, bone generation, pulp capping, Root canal treatment, as restorative materials, in air abrasion, enamel remineralization and finally dentin hypersensitivity
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Participants complaining from dentin hypersensitivity. * Middle aged patients. * Good oral hygiene.
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant women. * Patients with allergy to any material used in this study. * Smoking patients will affect the oral hygiene and periodontal health. * Patients taking anti-inflammatory drugs that will affect the perception of hypersensitivity. * Systemically compromised patients. * Smokers. * Patients received desensitization treatment in the last 6 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain due to dentin hypersenstivity | baseline preoperative, immediate postoperative, 1 , 6 and 12-months' time | Dentin hypersensitivity was assessed by three different stimuli (evaporative , thermal and tactile) to simulate the different situations in which Dentin hypersensitivity arises. Using the Visual Analog scale (VAS), the participant marks the pain intensity on a graduated 10 cm straight line (0 = no pain, 10 = extreme pain) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Color change (Tooth discoloration) | Baseline preoperative, immediate postoperative, 1,6 and 12-months time | According to the Modified USPH criteria Alpha: Matches tooth Bravo: Acceptable mismatch Charlie: Unacceptable mismatch |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed