Skip to content

High Energy Density Pulse Electromagnetic Field for Patients With Frozen Shoulder

Efficacy of High Energy Density Pulse Electromagnetic Field for Patients With Frozen Shoulder: A Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trail

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05979974
Enrollment
17
Registered
2023-08-07
Start date
2023-10-31
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2025-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frozen Shoulder

Keywords

Frozen Shoulder, high energy density pulse electromagnetic field

Brief summary

The aim of our study is to investigate the efficacy of high energy density pulse electromagnetic field for patients with frozen shoulder

Detailed description

Frozen shoulder causes shoulder pain and limited range of motion(ROM). It is thought to afflict between 2 and 5% of the general population. Individuals of middle age are most often affected, typically during the 5th to 7th decades of life. Typical symptoms include gradual onset of shoulder pain, limited shoulder ROM at least in two or more directions (especially in external rotation). In the case of primary adhesive capsulitis, the disease is usually self-limiting, and typically lasts 18-24 months. However, persistent symptoms and movement restriction beyond 3 years have been reported in up to 40% of patients, with up to 15% of patients suffering permanent disability. Therefore, an effective treatment is necessary to treat the shoulder pain and disability caused by frozen shoulder. High energy density pulse electromagnetic field (High-PEMF), different from traditional PEMF, includes characteristics as following: 1. The short pulse duration (50μs) with a damped oscillation 2. The broad bandwidth(200kHz\ 300MHz) with a basic frequency 240kHz 3. High voltages (up to 40 kV) and peak currents (up to 10 kA) arise in the applicator spool 4. Delivery of energy per pulse of about 96Ws (Joule) with a magnetic flux density of 50\ 100mT 5. Depth penetration for tissue and organ up to 20 cm It has been applied in chronic tendinopathy with positive outcomes. However, few studies support its application in the setting of frozen shoulder. Hence, the aim of our study is to investigate the efficacy and the underlying possible mechanism of High-PEMF for patients with frozen shoulder.

Interventions

The treatment coil is placed over the shoulder region at the maximum pain point for 9 minutes. A high energy of high-PEMF with a rate of 3 pulse per second is applied to the patient.

OTHERphysiotherapy

Physiotherapy such as shoulder passive and active-assisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, Pendulum exercises, Codman's exercises and Cross-body reach exercises. Under the physiotherapist's guidance, the patient receives the training session about 30 minutes every time.

The sham treatment coil is placed over the shoulder region at the maximum pain point for 9 minutes. The setting is the same as the experimental group(high energy, a rate of 3 pulse per second) with the difference that the energy output doesn't export to the patient.

Sponsors

Tri-Service General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Frozen shoulder is diagnosed by physicians based on the patient's medical history, physical examination, X-ray, and ultrasound reports. 2. The symptoms persist for more than 3 months. 3. There is a reduction of at least 30 degrees in at least two of the affected shoulder joint angles compared to the angles of the healthy side: shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Shoulder musculoskeletal ultrasound reveals a full-thickness tear or massive tear of the shoulder rotator cuff tendons or calcific tendinitis. 2. Systemic rheumatic disease. 3. History of shoulder fracture or previous surgical treatment of the shoulder joint. 4. Acute cervical nerve root compression. 5. Patients with instability (e.g., those with symptoms of internal bleeding) or cancer patients. 6. Received shoulder injections for treatment within the past 3 months. 7. Impaired cognitive function that prevents the patient from providing informed consent or participating in rehabilitation therapy. 8. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 9. Meets any of the contraindications for high-energy electromagnetic pulse therapy: organ transplant recipients; individuals with implanted cardiac pacemakers, defibrillators, metal implants (such as stents), cochlear implants, and insulin supplementation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pain Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)the change from baseline, post-intervention immediately, post-intervention 1, 3, 6 monthsThe visual analogue scale (VAS) is a scale used to determine the pain intensity experienced by individuals. 0 means painless and 10 means extremely painful.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)the change from baseline, post-intervention immediately, post-intervention 1, 3, 6 monthsShoulder function and disability were evaluated using the Chinese version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), a self-report questionnaire that yields pain and disability domain and total scores. The SPADI includes five questions on pain and eight questions on disability, referring to various problems with the shoulder encountered over the preceding week. Each item's score ranges from 0 (no pain/normal) to 10 (maximal pain/disability), with total scores of pain from 0-50 and disability from to 0-80. A higher score shows more disability.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026