Skip to content

Comparison of Produce Prescription Benefit Dosage

Comparison of Produce Prescription Benefit Dosage on Redemption

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05978843
Enrollment
242
Registered
2023-08-07
Start date
2024-03-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Insecurity

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between produce prescription program 'dose' on benefit redemption, food insecurity, and fruit and vegetable consumption. Participants will be randomized to receive one of three fruit and vegetable benefit dose amounts for 6 months ($40, $80, or $110/month).

Detailed description

Emerging evidence from the growing body of research around 'Food is Medicine' interventions shows promise that produce prescriptions (PPR) improve health by enabling purchases of healthy foods, reducing food insecurity, and improving diet quality. However, PPR amounts are often set seemingly arbitrarily, without clear connection to their intended purpose. In this study, investigators will conduct a three-armed randomized trial of 240 participants in Stockton, CA to test the impact of three 'doses' of a fruit and vegetable benefit on benefit redemption, food security, and fruit and vegetable intake. The goal of this study is to determine the relationship between PPR program 'dose' and the key intermediate outcomes of benefit redemption (primary outcome), food insecurity, and consumption of incentivized foods (secondary outcomes). Investigators will also seek to identify any 'ceiling effect' above which further increases in benefit value do not lead to further benefit redemption. This will be highly informative for subsequent PPR research. Investigators will leverage the existing infrastructure of the Vouchers 4 Veggies - EatSF produce prescription program to ensure feasibility.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMonetary benefit to purchase fruits and vegetables

Participants will receive varying benefit amounts to purchase fruits and vegetables.

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER
American Heart Association
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized into one of three arms. Each arm will receive a different benefit amount during the 6-month intervention period, with benefit amounts determined by a percentage of the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) - the USDA food plan used to calculate SNAP benefit rates. For ethical reasons, participants will each receive the same total benefit amount over the course of the study, with those randomized to the lower benefit arms receiving the difference between the value of the benefits issued to them and the value of the benefits issued to the highest dose group as a lump sum payment at the end of the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Individual enrolled in a First Five Program at El Concilio California, located in Stockton, CA * Age 18+ * English or Spanish speaking * Literacy sufficient to complete a written survey * Technologic capacity to complete an online survey

Exclusion criteria

* non English or Spanish speaking * cognitive impairment severe enough to interfere with understanding of the survey or consent form, whether due to cognitive delay, substance abuse, dementia, mental illness, or other etiologies * Not enrolled in a First Five Program at El Concilio California * Actively receiving another V4V/EatSF card

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Benefit redemptionMonthly for 6 monthsDollar amount of benefits redeemed (numerator) over total dollar amount of benefits distributed (denominator)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fruit and vegetable consumption0, 3, and 6 monthsMeasured by NCI Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) and reported in cup-equivalents, a higher score indicates greater fruit and vegetable intake (better outcome)
Food security status0, 3, and 6 monthsMeasured by USDA 18-item food security module. A higher score indicates more severe food insecurity (worse outcome); Scores converted to Rasch measurement scale, with a higher score indicates more severe food insecurity

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHilary Seligman, MD, MAS

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026