Skip to content

Clinical Effectiveness of Damon Ultima Vs Conventional Brackets Trial)

Clinical Effectiveness of Damon Ultima Vs Conventional Brackets (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05978817
Enrollment
34
Registered
2023-08-07
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
2025-05-01
Last updated
2024-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skeletal and Dental CL I Malocclusion Moderate Crowding

Brief summary

Compare the clinical performance, root resorption and pain perception between passive self-ligating Damon Ultema vs conventional brackets.

Detailed description

Damon Ultima System was introduced and claimed to be the first true full expression orthodontic system designed for faster and more precise finishing. The brackets were completely reengineered to virtually eliminate play for precise control of rotation, angulation and torque. Moreover, the system used specially designed archwires regarding wire dimensions and shape to fulfill the manufacturers claim.

Interventions

DEVICEDamon Ultima bracket

It is metal twin bracket with their recommended arch wire

Sponsors

University of Baghdad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Double (open label)

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 15-35 years of age patients who are healthy and without medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics. * Patients with Class I normal occlusion with moderate dental irregularity (with 4-6 irregularity index) requiring non-extraction treatment. * Presence of all the permanent teeth apart from the third molars. * Patients with good oral hygiene and periodontal health. * Without previous orthodontic treatment/ functional appliances

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from recruitment if he had sever skeletal discrepancy that requires orthognathic surgery. • Patients who have cleft lip or palate, hypodontia, or hyperdontia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occlusal outcomes assessment1 year1\. Alignment, 2. Marginal ridge height, 3. Buccolingual inclination, 4. Overjet, 5. Occlusal contacts, 6. Occlusal relationships, 7. Interproximal contacts (1-7) Component: scores \< 0.5 = 0. 0.5 to 1 mm =1. \> 1 mm = 2. 8. Root angulation: Root parallelism = 0. Roots are not parallel = 1. Contacting adjacent tooth = 2. High scores on individual segments, or combinations of individual segments, may cause a case to become Incomplete. SO: the minimum value = 0 the maximum value = 16 the high score means = worse outcome the low score means = better outcome
Little Irregularity index:6 monthsThis technique involves measuring the linear distance from anatomic contact point to the adjacent anatomic contact point of the mandibular anterior teeth , used to assess the changes in dental alignment throughout the study. initial irregularity index is (3 mm to 7mm) = worse out come and the final irregularity index is zero mm= best out come
Arch parameter measurement:1 yearArch length, arch width will be measured in millimeters and shape will be assessed by change from narrow shape arch to wide shape arch
Root alingment1 yearRoot movement in 3 plane of space will be evaluated at the end of the alignment phase after insertion of stainless steel wire which may will Tacke about 6 months and at the end of the treatment after about 6 months using CBCT. The inclination of upper and lower teeth will be assessed
Root resorption1 yearOrthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption OIIRR will be assessed and the prevalence of root resorption will be calculated using CBCT radiographs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient experience and satisfaction1 yearThe pain perception will be assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after wire insertion, at 4, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and immediately after each monthly visit (0 no pain, 3 simple pain, 100 very sever pain). Pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ) will be used to assess the patient reliability to pain. This will be done using the Arabic version of PSQ (The patient answer no or yes)

Countries

Iraq

Contacts

Primary ContactNawar A jebory, PHD student
nooorznawar@gmail.com07809752102
Backup ContactDheaa H Al-Groosh, PHD
dheaaha73@yahoo.com07737776503

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026