Skip to content

Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel for CMD in Patients With AMI: A Retrospective Study Based on the Angio-IMR

Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study Based on the Angiography-derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05978726
Enrollment
325
Registered
2023-08-07
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2022-05-30
Last updated
2023-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Heart Disease

Brief summary

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is increasingly recognized as an important indicator for long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) is a novel guidewire-free measure for CMD in patients with AMI. Ticagrelor has recently been suggested to have additional benefits on coronary microcirculation beyond its antiplatelet effect. This study was designed to compare the protective effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on CMD and prognostic impact in patients with AMI, using the angio-IMR as a novel assessment tool.

Interventions

DRUGDual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and either ticagrelor or clopidogrel

Patients with acute myocardial infarction randomly received dual antiplatelet therapy with with aspirin 100mg daily and either ticagrelor 90mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75mg once daily for at least 9 months after PCI as needed.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who were diagnosed with AMI, including STEMI and NSTEMI, and underwent successful PCI and routine follow-up coronary angiography at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2020.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\) prior treatment with any P2Y12 inhibitor; * 2\) need for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy; * 3\) previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); * 4\) chronic renal dysfunction with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/ (min·1.73 m2) or on hemodialysis; * 5\) liver cirrhosis ≥Child-Pugh B class; * 6\) cancer; * 7\) adjustment of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) during follow-up; * 8\) inadequate coronary angiographic images.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The improvement of angio-IMRwithin 24 months post-PCIDifference between Angio-IMR at follow-up coronary angiography and Angio-IMR after PCI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial reinfarctionWithin 24 months post-PCIAnother myocardial infarction with elevated myocardial enzymes and abnormal electrocardiograms
Target vessel revascularizationWithin 24 months post-PCIRepeat revascularization was performed because of ischemia in the target-vessel territory
Readmission for heart failureWithin 24 months post-PCIReadmission for an acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure or acute heart failure
Cerebral hemorrhageWithin 24 months post-PCIThe occurrence of cerebral hemorrhage during the follow-up period was based on imaging CT and MRI
Other bleeding eventsWithin 24 months post-PCIBleeding events such as gingival bleeding, skin bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding and so on, occurred during the follow-up period
Non-target vessel revascularizationWithin 24 months post-PCIRepeat revascularization was performed because of ischemia in the non-target vessel territory

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026