Skip to content

Comparing Oral Versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

Comparing Oral Versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (COPAT) Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05977868
Acronym
COPAT
Enrollment
94
Registered
2023-08-07
Start date
2023-08-04
Completion date
2025-02-14
Last updated
2025-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone and Joint Infection, Endovascular Infection, Gastrointestinal Infection, Genitourinary Infection, Pulmonary Infection, Skin and Soft Tissue Infection

Keywords

COpAT, Oral antimicrobial therapy, OPAT, Parenteral antimicrobial therapy, Intravenous antimicrobial therapy, Implementation science

Brief summary

This is an investigator initiated multisite pragmatic randomized controlled trial designed to demonstrate equivalent effectiveness with improved safety of early transition from intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy to complex outpatient oral antimicrobial therapy (COpAT) across various infectious diseases (endovascular, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary infections). All patients referred for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) will be evaluated by the research team with respect to inclusion/exclusion criteria. If determined eligible for enrollment, patients will be approached by a study investigator who will present the COPAT Trial. Once informed consent is obtained, patients will be randomized 2:1 using computer software into experimental or control (standard of care) group, respectively: Experimental: COpAT only on hospital discharge; Control: Conventional OPAT, OPAT transitioned to COpAT later in outpatient setting, or long-acting parenteral lipoglycopeptides. Both groups will be followed by an ID physician on the research team with in-person or telemedicine ID Clinic standard of care visits at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after hospital discharge. At the 6-week ID Clinic follow-up, patients will be asked to complete a patient satisfaction survey. The following 2 primary outcomes will be assessed: cure at 3 months using clinical (resolution of infection) and laboratory (improvement in inflammatory markers) parameters and adverse events related to antimicrobial therapy/vascular access complication or readmission at 3 months. The following secondary outcome will be assessed: patient satisfaction at 6 weeks. The experimental group is being compared to standard of care in current clinical practice. As this is a pragmatic clinical trial, patients will not undergo additional invasive testing or procedures.

Interventions

DRUGAmoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefadroxil, cefpodoxime, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin, delafloxacin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, linezolid

COpAT (oral antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge

DRUGAmpicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftaroline, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, dalbavancin, daptomycin, ertapenem

Standard of care (IV antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge

Sponsors

West Virginia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The primary outcome of cure at 3 months will be adjudicated by a 2 ID faculty blinded to study arm.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion (must meet all of the following): * English speaking * The patient is hospitalized at J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital, United Hospital Center, Berkeley Medical Center, Wheeling Hospital, or Camden Clark Medical Center * The patient has been diagnosed with ≥ 1 of the following: endovascular, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary infection * The patient is being transitioned to 2-8 weeks of IV antibacterial therapy on hospital discharge * The patient has capacity to participate in routine OPAT/COpAT follow-up (telephone check-ins, laboratory monitoring, and in-person or telemedicine ID Clinic follow-up) Exclusion (may not meet any of the following): * The patient is not appropriate for OPAT (active injection drug use, lack of infusion resources, and/or unstable outpatient environment) * The patient is not appropriate for COpAT (unable to receive PO medication or lack of an effective PO antimicrobial option based on susceptibility testing) * The patient is unable to give informed consent * The patient is a prisoner, pregnant, and/or mentally handicapped * The patient is determined unsafe for enrollment at the primary team's discretion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cure/Control at 3 Months3 months after hospital dischargeNumber of patients with cure/control using clinical (resolution of infection - e.g., wound healed) and laboratory (improvement in inflammatory markers - e.g., CRP normalization) parameters as adjudicated by 2 ID faculty blinded to study arm
Adverse Events Related to Antimicrobial TherapyUp to 3 months after hospital dischargeNumber of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to antimicrobial therapy (e.g., thrombocytopenia)
Adverse Events Related to Vascular AccessUp to 3 months after hospital dischargeNumber of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to vascular access complication (e.g., deep venous thrombosis)
Overall ReadmissionUp to 3 months after hospital dischargeNumber of participants readmitted for any reason up to 3 months after discharge from the hospital

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey6 weeks after hospital dischargePatient satisfaction using the COPAT Trial Patient Satisfaction Survey at 6 Weeks, which is a short questionnaire (with the overall satisfaction question incorporating a Likert scale 1= Very Dissatisfied, 5= Very Satisfied) designed to assess overall patient satisfaction. Overall satisfaction totaled from participants answering 4= Satisfied and 5= Very Satisfied.
Number of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)6 weeks after hospital dischargeThe number of participants who expressed a preference to be in the other study arm (i.e., answers 'Yes' to the survey question Would you have preferred to be in the other study arm? Yes or No).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 (Experimental)
COpAT (oral antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge Amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefadroxil, cefpodoxime, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin, delafloxacin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, linezolid: COpAT (oral antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge
62
Group 2 (Control)
Standard of care (IV antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge Ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftaroline, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, dalbavancin, daptomycin, ertapenem: Standard of care (IV antimicrobial therapy) on hospital discharge
28
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyTransitioned to comfort care10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 2 (Control)TotalGroup 1 (Experimental)
Age, Continuous61.5 years60 years57.5 years
Bacteremia13 Participants43 Participants30 Participants
Comorbidities
Cardiac
13 participants31 participants18 participants
Comorbidities
Diabetes
11 participants44 participants33 participants
Comorbidities
Obesity
17 participants56 participants39 participants
Comorbidities
Pulmonary
5 participants15 participants10 participants
Comorbidities
Renal
0 participants6 participants6 participants
Infection Type
Bone and Joint
20 Participants66 Participants46 Participants
Infection Type
Endovascular
5 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Infection Type
Other
3 Participants11 Participants8 Participants
Length of Hospital Stay10 days9 days8 days
Organism Isolated
Enterobacterales
3 participants11 participants8 participants
Organism Isolated
MRSA
3 participants18 participants15 participants
Organism Isolated
MSSA
14 participants37 participants23 participants
Organism Isolated
Staphylococcus aureus
17 participants55 participants38 participants
Organism Isolated
Streptococcus species
7 participants20 participants13 participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 participants90 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants33 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants57 Participants37 Participants
Surgery/Drainage19 Participants74 Participants55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 640 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 648 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 647 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Adverse Events Related to Antimicrobial Therapy

Number of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to antimicrobial therapy (e.g., thrombocytopenia)

Time frame: Up to 3 months after hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1 (Experimental)Adverse Events Related to Antimicrobial Therapy4 Participants
Group 2 (Control)Adverse Events Related to Antimicrobial Therapy4 Participants
Primary

Adverse Events Related to Vascular Access

Number of participants with adverse events requiring intervention related to vascular access complication (e.g., deep venous thrombosis)

Time frame: Up to 3 months after hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1 (Experimental)Adverse Events Related to Vascular Access0 Participants
Group 2 (Control)Adverse Events Related to Vascular Access7 Participants
Primary

Cure/Control at 3 Months

Number of patients with cure/control using clinical (resolution of infection - e.g., wound healed) and laboratory (improvement in inflammatory markers - e.g., CRP normalization) parameters as adjudicated by 2 ID faculty blinded to study arm

Time frame: 3 months after hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1 (Experimental)Cure/Control at 3 Months61 Participants
Group 2 (Control)Cure/Control at 3 Months28 Participants
Primary

Overall Readmission

Number of participants readmitted for any reason up to 3 months after discharge from the hospital

Time frame: Up to 3 months after hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1 (Experimental)Overall Readmission17 Participants
Group 2 (Control)Overall Readmission7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey

Patient satisfaction using the COPAT Trial Patient Satisfaction Survey at 6 Weeks, which is a short questionnaire (with the overall satisfaction question incorporating a Likert scale 1= Very Dissatisfied, 5= Very Satisfied) designed to assess overall patient satisfaction. Overall satisfaction totaled from participants answering 4= Satisfied and 5= Very Satisfied.

Time frame: 6 weeks after hospital discharge

Population: Four withdrew early prior to hospital discharge: 3 chose not to participate, and one transitioned to comfort care (mortality).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (Experimental)Number of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey60 participants
Group 2 (Control)Number of Participants Reporting 'Satisfied' or 'Very Satisfied' on Patient Satisfaction Survey27 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)

The number of participants who expressed a preference to be in the other study arm (i.e., answers 'Yes' to the survey question Would you have preferred to be in the other study arm? Yes or No).

Time frame: 6 weeks after hospital discharge

Population: Four withdrew early prior to hospital discharge: three chose not to participate, and one transitioned to comfort care (mortality).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (Experimental)Number of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)1 participants
Group 2 (Control)Number of Participants Who Answered 'Yes' to the Survey Question Would You Have Preferred to be in the Other Study Arm? (Yes or No)21 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026