Vaccination Hesitancy
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and acceptability of an mobile Health-based motivational interviewing (MI) intervention to promote SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (MOTIVACC) compared to traditional phone-based MI.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALStandard MI
One phone-based MI session
BEHAVIORALIntensive MI
Four phone-based MI sessions
BEHAVIORALMOTIVACC
mHealth-based MI
BEHAVIORALEcological momentary assessment (EMA) messages
EMA messages focused on vaccinations and health
Sponsors
University of Oklahoma
Oklahoma State University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* \>18 years * Reside in a rural area * No previous dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine * Speak English * Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* A cognitive or other disability that inhibits smart phone use * Inability to participate because of medical or psychiatric conditions diagnosed by a physician/clinician * Enrollment in other COVID-19 research; pregnant or lactating
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Changes in intention to receive the vaccine | Baseline and follow-up (8 weeks) |
| Changes in vaccine hesitancy and confidence | Baseline and follow-up (8 weeks) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Changes in ambivalence | Baseline and follow-up (8 weeks) |
| Changes in value-behavior discrepancy | Baseline and follow-up (8 weeks) |
| Changes in expectations related to vaccines | Baseline and follow-up (8 weeks) |
| Number of participants who receive the COVID-19 vaccine | Follow-up (8 weeks) |
| Changes in self-efficacy | Baseline and follow-up (8 weeks) |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Percentage of total of ecological momentary assessment messages opened/viewed | 8 weeks (from baseline to follow up) |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed