Skip to content

Green Dialysis: Dialysis With Reduced Dialysate Flow

Green Dialysis: Hemodialysis With Reduced Dialysate Flow

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05974436
Enrollment
10
Registered
2023-08-03
Start date
2023-07-18
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2023-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uremic Syndrome

Keywords

dialysis efficiency, lowered dialysis fluid

Brief summary

Hemodialysis patients consume per year 18.720-26.208L of dialysis fluid (i.e. water). From an ecological point of view, the present study investigated whether reducing this water amount has an impact on the extraction and total solute removal of different uremic toxins. The efficiency of hemodiafiltration with a standard high-flux dialyzer is compared to hemodialysis with a medium cut-off dialyzer with a dialysate flow of either 700mL/min or 300mL/min.

Detailed description

Hemodialysis is currently performed with dialysate flows in the range 500 and 700mL/min respectively in hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration mode. With a standard daytime dialysis scheme of three times four hours a week, each patient consumes up to 360-504L dialysate per week or 18.720-26.208L per year. From an ecological point of view, one can wonder whether patients can be dialyzed adequately enough using hemodialysis mode with a lower dialysate flow, and as such consuming less water. Changing the mode from hemodiafiltration to hemodialysis mainly has an impact on the removal of larger toxins which benefit of the convective transport. Lowering dialysate flow in hemodialysis mode mainly has an impact on the removal of small water soluble toxins which are mainly removed by diffusion. For this transport, different parameters are important: blood and dialysate flow, dimensions of the membrane (surface area and thickness), fiber diameter, and extra-luminal space, and membrane porosity (Sieving coefficient). This also implies that, for the same blood and dialysate flow, the choice of the dialyzer will determine toxin transport. The use of a medium cut-off membrane with smaller and more open fibers might thus be more adequate in hemodialysis mode than a standard high-flux dialyzer with wider fibers. The aim of this study is to quantify instant extraction and overall total solute removal of representative uremic toxins in hemodiafiltration with a standard high-flux hemodialyzer versus hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane, either with a standard or reduced dialysate flow.

Interventions

Blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet dialyzer bloodline at 5min after dialysis start. Spent dialysate is sampled from the outlet dialysate line at 5, 30, 90 and 240min after dialysis start. Blood and dialysate samples are analysed for different uremic toxins. Dialysis efficiency is calculated from the analysed toxin concentrations.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* stable chronic hemodialysis patient * well functioning vascular access

Exclusion criteria

* active infection * malignancies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dialysis efficiencythree midweek dialysis sessions (3 arms)Dialyzer extraction and total solute removal are measured and calculated for different uremic toxins

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026