Skip to content

Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture

Clinical Performance and Stability of Different Types of Implant Supported Overdenture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05972538
Enrollment
6
Registered
2023-08-02
Start date
2023-04-01
Completion date
2023-07-05
Last updated
2023-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Edentulism

Keywords

Implant stability, Pocket depth, Patient Satisfaction, Overdentures

Brief summary

A Total number of 36 implants were installed in 6 patients having mandibular single denture. The patients were divided into two groups according to the definitive prosthesis. Group I received ball and socket retained mandibular implant overdenture while Group II received cement retained implant supported fixed bridges.

Detailed description

Implant's stability, clinical performance (gingival index, pocket depth, plaque index and bleeding on probing) and patient's satisfaction were performed after 15, 30,60 and 90 days after prosthesis delivery

Interventions

DEVICEOsstell ( Osstell AB, Goteborg, Sweden).

Implant stability were assessed on 15, 30,60 and 90 days of prosthesis delivery

DEVICEperiodontal probe (Vivacare, TPS, Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein

Clinical evaluation included assessment of pocket depth, plaque index and bleeding on probing) around the implant abutments on 15, 30,60 and 90 days of prosthesis delivery

OTHERquestionnaire for patient satisfaction

A questionnaire was used to evaluate patient satisfaction on 90 days at the end of follow up period.

Sponsors

National Research Centre, Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

participants don't know which treatment type they received.

Intervention model description

two groups.Group I received ball and socket retained mandibular implant overdenture while Group II received cement retained implant supported fixed bridges

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* highly co-operative * non-smoker * systemically free from any chronic diseases

Exclusion criteria

* immunocompromised patients * patients having knife edge, flat or flabby ridge, * patients having T. M. J disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of change in implant stabilityon the 15th, 30th, 60th and 90th days of overdenture insertionAssessment of implant stability by device ( Ostell device)
Assessment of change in implants clinical performance throughout the follow-up period.on the 15th, 30th, 60th and 90th days of over denture insertion.Assessment of change in pocket depth, plaque index and bleeding on probing) around the implant abutments. by periodontal probe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of patient satisfactionon the 90th day of prosthesis deliveryA questionnaire was used to evaluate patient satisfaction

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026