Skip to content

A Study of Jincaopian Tablets on Chronic Pelvic Pain After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Dose-parallel, Placebo-controlled Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Jincaopian Tablets in Subjects with Chronic Pelvic Pain After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05970783
Enrollment
414
Registered
2023-08-01
Start date
2022-11-08
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2024-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pelvic Pain

Brief summary

The objective of this phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jincaopian Tablets in the treatment of subjects with chronic pelvic pain after pelvic inflammatory disease

Detailed description

Chronic pelvic pain is the major sequela of pelvic inflammatory disease and it's a common, burdensome, and costly condition that disproportionately affects women. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-parallel, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jincaopian Tablets in the treatment of subjects with chronic pelvic pain after pelvic inflammatory disease. In this trial, 414 subjects were enrolled and randomized to either Jincaopian Tablets group, or the placebo group in a 2:1 ratio. The treatment period is 12 weeks and the follow-up period is 4 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGJincaopian Tablets

Jincaopian Tablets 0.2g tid p.o.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo 0.2g tid p.o.

Sponsors

Beijing Konruns Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet the diagnostic criteria for chronic pelvic pain sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease; * The average VAS score of pain in the week before enrollment is ≥4; * The McCormack scale of physical signs at the time of enrollment is 4 to 12 points (including 4 points and 12 points); * Women aged 18 to 50 (including 18 and 50) with a history of sexual life; * Voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, give informed consent and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Pelvic inflammatory disease (acute attack); * Pregnant or lactating women, women of childbearing age who are unwilling to take effective measures to prevent pregnancy during the trial and within 6 months after the trial; * Previously diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, primary/secondary dysmenorrhea, pelvic stasis syndrome and chronic pelvic pain caused by other non-pelvic inflammatory diseases; * Complicated with specific vaginitis such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomonas vaginitis, bacterial vaginosis; * Gynecological tumors (maximum diameter of uterine fibroids greater than 3cm and submucosal fibroids), endometriosis, adenomyosis, acute cervicitis, tuberculous pelvic inflammatory disease, interstitial cystitis and other diseases related symptoms; * Placement of intrauterine device in the past 3 months; absence of uterus and bilateral appendages; * Received related treatment or took drugs with similar functions and indications within 14 days before the introduction; * Liver function: ALT or AST\>1.5 times the upper limit of normal value;Renal function:Scr\>1.0 times the upper limit of normal value; * Serum CA125 and erythrocyte sedimentation \> 1.1 times the upper limit of normal value. * Combined with serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, hematopoietic system and other serious diseases; * Have an allergic history to the experimental drug; * Have a long history of alcoholism or drug abuse; * Intellectual disabilities or mental disorders; * Participated in other clinical trials within the past 3 months; * The investigator believes that it is not suitable to participate in this clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain disappearance rate after 12 weeks of treatment12 WeeksThe pain disappearance referred to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score becoming 0-1 points, and was no longer greater than or equal to 2 points at any subsequent evaluation. The pain disappearance rate was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a pain disappearance after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of weekly average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment12 WeeksVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pelvic pain degree. The VAS score ranged from 0 to 10, and a higher score represented greater pain intensity. The average VAS value for a week was calculated by dividing the sum of the scores for each day of the week by the number of days the score was recorded.
The area under the VAS score-time curve12 WeeksAUC under the curve to evaluating pain levels
McCormick Scale12 WeeksThe McCormack scale was used to score the patient's physical signs. The total score is 36 points, rated from twelve aspects including uterine tenderness (divided into four quadrants), abdominal tenderness or rebound pain (divided into four quadrants), left or right adnexal tenderness, uterine tenderness, and cervical lifting and swinging pain. The scoring criteria was as following: no pain is 0 points; Mild pain without facial expression changes and muscle tension is 1 point; Pain accompanied by facial expressions and muscle tension is 2 points; Pain drama is 3 points.
Pain disappearance rate after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment8 WeeksThe pain disappearance referred to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score becoming 0-1 points, and was no longer greater than or equal to 2 points at any subsequent evaluation. The pain disappearance rate was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a pain disappearance after treatment.
Disease efficacy evaluation12 WeeksDisease efficacy was determined based on the change of the clinical signs and symptoms. Based on the evaluation criteria, the Disease efficacy was recorded as Clinical recovery, significant effect, effectiveness, and ineffectiveness. Clinical recovery: The symptoms and signs disappear, and the integral values of symptoms, signs, and auxiliary examinations decrease by ≥ 95%. Significant effect: The symptoms and signs are significantly reduced, with a reduction of ≥ 70% and\<95% in the score of symptoms, signs, and auxiliary examinations. Effective: Symptoms and signs have been alleviated, with a reduction of ≥ 30% and\<70% in symptom, sign, and auxiliary examination scores. Invalid: No reduction or aggravation of symptoms and signs, with a decrease of\<30% in the score of symptoms, signs, and auxiliary examinations
Adverse events (AEs)12 WeeksIncidence of treatment-related AEs
General quality of life (Short Form-12) scale12 WeeksThe Short Form-12 is an abbreviated version of the original 36-item QOL questionnaire. It comprises 12 items with a mental component summary (MCS) and a physical component summary (PCS). Possible scores for mental and physical health-related QOL subscales range from 0 to 100 points, and a higher score is interpreted as better QOL.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiuxiang Teng
tengxx@126.com+86 010-87906734

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026