Skip to content

Deployment of Irrigating Intraventricular Catheter System for Intraventricular Hemorrhage

DIVE: Deployment of Irrigating Intraventricular Catheter System for Intraventricular Hemorrhage

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05970549
Acronym
DIVE
Enrollment
17
Registered
2023-08-01
Start date
2022-06-14
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH)

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and outcomes associated with the use of IRRAflow® System catheters in externally draining intracranial fluid to reduce intracranial pressure. This study will be comparing the IRRAflow® system to standard of care catheters used in the same procedure. The IRRAflow® system is FDA approved for this procedure.

Detailed description

Intracranial hemorrhagic conditions can rapidly cause brain damage and often considered life- threatening. Of these, Intracerebral hemorrhagic (ICH) is the most common type of hemorrhagic stroke and is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality than all stroke subtypes. Management of hemorrhagic patients is typically orchestrated by neurosurgeons and neuro-intensivists. Comprehensive care should include surveillance and monitoring of Intra Cranial Pressure (ICP), Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP), and hemodynamic function. Furthermore, prevention of infection, complications of immobility through positioning and mobilization within physiological tolerance play an important role in optimizing outcomes after ICH. There are multiple approaches to facilitating Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) drainage and monitor ICP. Routinely, intracranial pressure is measured by use of devices inserted into the brain parenchyma or cerebral ventricles. A Ventricular Catheter (VC) inserted into the lateral ventricle allows for drainage of CSF to help reduce ICP. Although CSF drainage is a vital sequence in patient management, there are reported risks including infection and limitations related to erroneous readings associated with current ICP monitors. Physicians lack the appropriate tools to employ active intermittent aspiration and drainage with continuous ICP monitoring. The current clinical study is being initiated to evaluate the hypothesis that active irrigation by IRRAflow will reduce the time needed for clearance of intraventricular blood from intraventricular space.

Interventions

DEVICEIRRAflow® Active Fluid Exchange System

All patients in the prospective arm of the study who met the study criteria and consent will be enrolled in the IRRAflow with Active Fluid Exchange arm. Insertion of the IRRaflow catheter will be performed by neurosurgical attendings and residents who are privileged to place external ventricular drains and who have be instructed on how to appropriately connect the inserted IRRAflow catheter to the system. The on-site IRRAflow instructor will be present and available at all time to assist with any issues or questions should they arise.

DEVICETraditional extraventricular drain

The retrospective analysis will be performed on the last 60 traditional external ventricular drains.

PROCEDURENon-contrast head CTs

Non-contrast head CTs will be performed at least every 48 hours to document effectiveness. This frequency is standard, if not more frequent as necessary, for patients with external ventricular drainage and intraventricular hemorrhage. Scans are routinely obtained at this frequency to evaluate, for example: evacuation of hemorrhage, admission pathology, post-placement of catheters, any change in neurological exam, or after elevations in intracranial pressure. With these common CT scans we will be able to assess the efficacy of the IRRAflow catheter on the specified parameters. These scans are routinely performed due to this pathology and as such are covered as a necessity of the hospitalization by the insurance companies. MRI may be used in place of a CT scan if medically indicated as determined by the neurosurgical attending or neurocritical care attending according to standard of care for treatment of the neurological pathology.

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER
ClearPoint Neuro
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

There will be no masking involved. The proposed study is a single center retrospective and prospective cohort, controlled, single-center, phase 1 study evaluating the safety and radiographic outcomes associated use of the IRRAS catheter compared to standard of care external ventricular drains.

Intervention model description

The IRRAflow® System is an active fluid exchange system in which intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, active controlled irrigation and passive drainage are combined in one system. The system consists of 3 items; control unit (i) and two sterile disposable parts: (ii) Intelligent Digital Cassette (Tube Set) and (iii) dual-lumen Catheter.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>=18 years of age * Intraventricular hemorrhage documented on head CT or MRI scan * Need of cerebrospinal fluid drainage * Indication for active treatment evaluated by the treating physicians * Signed informed consent obtained by patient or Legal Authorized Representative * Treatment possible within 72 hours of ictus

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has fixed and dilated pupils * Pregnant or nursing women (fertile female participants will be required to take a validated pregnancy test for evaluation of pregnancy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual blood volumeAt day 5Residual blood volume on post bleed day 5

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serious adverse eventsup to 48 hours post-procedureNumber of serious adverse events
Hospital quality metricsup to 48 hours post-procedureLength of stay in the NSICU as a quality metrics
Length of stay in the NSICUup to 48 hours post-procedureLength of hospital stay in the as a quality metrics
Direct hospitalization costsup to 48 hours post-procedureDirect hospitalization costs

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTEmily Svendsen
Emily.Svendsen@mountsinai.org(212) 241-3238
CONTACTSydney Edwards
Sydney.Edwards@mountsinai.org(212) 241-2524
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristopher P Kellner, MD

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026