Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of Implantable Intrathecal Systems for Refractory Pain in Spain (INTRATHECAL-RENASED)

Effectiveness and Safety of Implantable Intrathecal Systems for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain in Spain: Prospective Multicenter Study From the Spanish Pain Society Registry (INTRATHECAL-RENASED)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05970081
Enrollment
504
Registered
2023-08-01
Start date
2023-08-01
Completion date
2025-08-01
Last updated
2024-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Refractory Pain

Keywords

Intrathecal Drug Delivery, Implantable Infusion Pump, Refractory Pain

Brief summary

Refractory pain is a prevalent condition that negatively affects patients' quality of life. Intrathecal implantable systems have been proposed as a treatment option for refractory pain. However, real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of these therapies in Spain are scarce. This study aims to obtain real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of intrathecal implantable systems for refractory pain treatment in Spain.

Detailed description

All Spanish hospitals that implant intrathecal systems for refractory pain will be invited to participate in the study. Patients will be recruited before the procedure, and before providing data to the registry, the study will be explained to them, and they will sign an informed consent form. Demographic data related to the pathology and procedure will be collected. Follow-up will be conducted at three and twelve months after the procedure.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Sociedad Espanola del Dolor
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic refractory pain patients candidates for treatment with an implantable neurostimulation system. * Accept to participate in the study and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in whom it would be difficult to complete follow-up. * Insufficient understanding of the Spanish language. * Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with at least 50 percent pain relief in the area of their predominant pain at one yearTwelve monthsPercentage of patients who experience a reduction of at least 50 percent in the intensity of their predominant pain compared to the initial value, assessed twelve months after the implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. Pain intensity will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), with a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain possible)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with at least 50 percent pain relief in the area of their non-predominant pain at one yearTwelve monthsPercentage of patients who experience a reduction of at least 50 percent in the intensity of their non-predominant pain compared to the initial value, assessed twelve months after the implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. Pain intensity will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), with a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain possible)
Compared change from baseline on health-related quality of life scores (EQ Index)Three and twelve monthsThe impact of the treatment on the patient's health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at three and twelve months after implantation. The EQ-5D-5L assesses quality of life across five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain is scored on a scale of 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), generating a 5-digit code that corresponds to the patient's health status.
Percentage of patients with at least 50 percent pain relief in the area of their predominant pain at three monthsThree monthsPercentage of patients who experience a reduction of at least 50 percent in the intensity of their predominant pain compared to the initial value, assessed three months after the implantation of the implantable intrathecal system. Pain intensity will be measured using an 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), with a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain possible)
Patient SatisfactionThree and twelve monthsPercentage of implanted subjects satisfied with the treatment at three and twelve months after the implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. Defined as indicating: since the start of the therapy has the pain improved? yes/no, Are you satisfied with the treatment? yes/no or would you agree to the treatment again? yes/no
Number of Adverse Events as a Measure of SafetyThree and twelve monthsNumber and percentage of patients with adverse effects related to therapy at three and twelve months after implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system.
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)Three and twelve monthsAssessment of clinical global impression of improvement using the PGI-I scale at three and twelve months after implantation of the intrathecal drug delivery system. The PGI-I score ranges from 1 (Very much better) through to 7 (Very much worse). The lower the score, the better the improvement.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactAntonio Ojeda, MD
renased@sedolor.es0034911729144

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026