Skip to content

Atmospheric Projection in the Emergency Department

AtmosphEric pRojection for paIn and Anxiety reLated to Minor Medical Procedures in the Emergency Department: a Monocentric, Parallel, Randomized, Controlled Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05967988
Acronym
AERIAL-MED
Enrollment
62
Registered
2023-08-01
Start date
2023-08-14
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2025-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Acute, Pain, Acute

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the reduction of pain and anxiety during a minor procedure in the emergency department on adult patients through the visualisation of atmospheric projection as a distraction mean. The main question it aims to answer is : Can the atmospheric projection of a video reduce pain and anxiety in adult patients receiving painful procedures in the emergency department ? Participants will look at an atmospheric projection (projection of a media on the walls and roof around the patient) while receiving their planned care procedures. Researchers will compare an active group watching a video with a control group watching a simple colored light to see if the visualisation of an atmospheric projected video reduces pain and anxiety more than the visualisation of a colored light does.

Interventions

DEVICEImmersive atmospheric projection

Projection of computer-generated videos or videos of real moving landscapes on the walls of the examination room

DEVICEMinimal atmospheric projection

Projection of a colors on the walls on the walls of the examination room

Sponsors

University of Lausanne
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Lausanne Hospitals
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The patient will assess the outcome him/herself. The statistician will also be blinded to the group assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged ≥18 ; * Patient requiring one of the following treatment procedures : suturing, plaster cast placement and/or repositioning, fracture or dislocation reduction, ascites puncture, pleural puncture, lumbar puncture.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient clinically unstable; * Patient incapable of discernment or consent ; * Altered mental status (cognitive disorders, mental retardation, acute state of confusion, acute psychosis); * Alcoholic patient with University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) score of 10/10 ; * Patient hard of hearing ; * Patient with visual impairments preventing him/her from perceiving his/her environment ; * Patient unable to understand the use of visual analog scales (VAS); * Impaired sensitivity of the part of the body where the medical intervention is to take place; * Planned use of analgesia/sedation with a dissociative agent (midazolam, ketamine, propofol); * Incarcerated patient ; * Patient transferred from another hospital ; * Patient having already participated in this study during a previous consultation in the emergency department of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural PainJust after the procedureMaximal pain intensity experienced by the patient during the medical procedure, assessed using a Visual Analogic Scale from 0mm to 100mm anchored with No pain/Worst pain imaginable
Procedural AnxietyJust after the procedureMaximal anxiety intensity felt by the patient during the medical procedure, assessed using a Visual Analogic Scale from 0mm to 100mm anchored with Not at all anxious/Extremely anxious.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appreciation of the atmospheric projectionJust after the procedureAppreciation of the atmospheric projection by the patient, using a Visual Analogic Scale from 0mm to 100mm, anchored with least appreciative/most appreciative)
Patient's comfortJust after the procedurePatient's comfort during the atmospheric projection, assessed using a Visual Analogic Scale from 0mm to 100mm, anchored with least comfortable /most comfortable
Procedural supportAfter the procedureProcedural support provided by the projection during the medical procedure according to the physician in charge of the procedure, assessed using a 3-level Likert scale (yes-neutral-no)
TelepresenceJust after the procedureTelepresence will be assessed by the Igroupe Presence Questionnaire composed of 14 statements grouped into 4 categories: (1) spatial presence (the sense of being physically present in the virtual environment), (2) involvement (attention devoted to the virtual environment and experienced involvement), (3) experienced realism (the subjective experience of realism in the virtual environment), and (4) the general sense of being in the virtual environment. Each question is rated on a 7-point scale (0 to 6), with greater scores indicating a greater sense of presence in the projected environment
CybercinetosisJust after the procedureCybercinetosis is a symptom similar to motion sickness that occurs with exposure to a virtual environment, will be assessed using a 3-level Likert scale (light-moderate-severe)
Pain catastrophizingJust before the procedurePain catastrophizing will be assessed using the French version of the Situational Catastrophizing Questionnaire, a 6-question adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Procedural disturbanceJust after the procedureProcedural disturbance for physicians caused by the atmospheric projection interfering with the medical procedure, assessed using a 3-level Likert scale (yes-neutral-no)
DissociationJust after the procedureDissociation of the patients represents the mental separation of the patient from their environment, assessed using a Visual Analogic Scale from 0mm to 100mm, anchored with most present in the clinical environment / the most immersed in the projected environment

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026