Pulmonary Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the quality of images when low-concentration iodine contrast agents is used in chest CT with low tube voltage and if they can be used in routine imaging. The primary endpoint of the study was the quality of the image and comparison of chest CT by using low and conventional concentration iodine contrast agents with low tube voltage and chest CT by using the conventional concentration iodine contrast agents with the conventional tube voltage; The secondary endpoint is optimizing chest CT protocol using an iodine contrast agent.
Detailed description
With persistent advances in computed tomography (CT) technology, there is a need for continuous investigation and optimization of injection protocols. Intravenous contrast enhancement in CT is affected by various interacting factors, which can be roughly divided into 3 categories: patient, contrast medium and CT scanning. Over the last decade, evolutions in technology has resulted in faster CTs with improved temporal and spatial resolutions; newer techniques such as iterative reconstruction has enabled lower tube voltage (expressed in units of peak kiloVolt, kVp) and lower dose CTs with less noise and preserved image quality. As CT scanning is one of the major determinants of contrast enhancement at CT, such technological advances in CT can be assumed to have invariably caused alterations in the degree of contrast enhancement at CT. However, despite changes in CT scanning techniques, recommended contrast injection protocol for chest CT with enhancement (CECT), including concentration of iodine contrast material, have not changed over the last decade; for routine chest CECT, the use of 300-350 mgI/ml iodine contrast material has been recommended without definitely stating the precise reasons using that specific iodine concentration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality of low voltage chest CECT using LCCM(Low-Concentration Iodinated Contrast Media.
Interventions
DRUGIohexol (320mgI/mL) with 120kVp
Patient undergoing CT scan with 120kVp protocol and using Iobrix inj. 320 (Taejoon pharm, Seoul, South Korea). CT images were obtained 55sec after Contrast media injection(100mL, 2mL/sec) with 20mL saline flushing.
DRUGIohexol (320mgI/mL) with 100kVp
Patient undergoing CT scan with 100kVp protocol and using Iobrix inj. 320 (Taejoon pharm, Seoul, South Korea). CT images were obtained 55sec after Contrast media injection(100mL, 2mL/sec) with 20mL saline flushing.
DRUGIohexol (270mgI/mL) with 100kVp
Patient undergoing CT scan with 100kVp protocol and using Iobrix inj. 270 (Taejoon pharm, Seoul, South Korea). CT images were obtained 55sec after Contrast media injection(100mL, 2mL/sec) with 20mL saline flushing.
DRUGIohexol (240mgI/mL) with 100kVp
Patient undergoing CT scan with 100kVp protocol and using Iobrix inj. 240 (Taejoon pharm, Seoul, South Korea). CT images were obtained 55sec after Contrast media injection(100mL, 2mL/sec) with 20mL saline flushing.
Sponsors
Taejoon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Jung Im Jung
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged 19 years or older, weighing less than 90 kg, and BMI less than 30 who underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT alone
Exclusion criteria
1. Under the age of 18 2. Cases where contrast-enhanced CT cannot be performed 3. Heart failure 4. Pregnancy 5. If patients cannot voluntarily give written consent to participate in this clinical trial 6. In the case of an anatomical deformation that may interfere with image analysis in the previous image 7. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to IOBRIX, components of IOBRIX, and iodine-based drugs 8. Patients with severe thyroid disease (Iodine may accumulate in the thyroid gland and worsen symptoms.) 9. Those who are judged unsuitable by the tester for other reasons Patients aged 19 years or older, weighing less than 90 kg, and BMI less than 30 who underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT alone
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Anatomic depiction (including image sharpness) | 12 months after the CT scan (Chest contrast-enhanced CT is a 1-day procedure, but evaluating all the images will be done one year after the 1st CT scan.) | 3 points scale qualitative analysis evaluated by two different radiologists (Poor, moderate, excellent) |
| Noise | 12 months after the CT scan | 3 points scale qualitative analysis evaluated by two different radiologists (Severe, minor, negligible) |
| Contrast-related artifact | 12 months after the CT scan | 3 points scale qualitative analysis evaluated by two different radiologists (Severe, minor, negligible) |
| Overall diagnostic acceptability | 12 months after the CT scan | 5 points scale qualitative analysis evaluated by two different radiologists (Non-diagnostic, suboptimal, standard, better than standard, Excellent) |
Countries
South Korea
Contacts
Primary ContactJung IM Jung, MD, PhD
Outcome results
None listed