Skip to content

A Culturally Adapted, Social Support-Based, Physical Activity Interventions for South Asian Indian Women in the United States

A Culturally Adapted, Social Support-Based, Physical Activity Interventions for South Asian Indian Women in the United States: A Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05966506
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-07-28
Start date
2023-11-14
Completion date
2024-03-19
Last updated
2025-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior

Keywords

physical activity, social support

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-based dyadic social support health coaching physical activity (PA) intervention in inactive South Asian Indian (SAI) and to explore preliminary effects of the intervention on intermediate outcomes: self-reported and objective moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), social support, and self-efficacy .

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDyad-based Zoom health coaching

This will be delivered by a certified nurse coach, certified in holistic nursing who will provide 6 sessions of Zoom health coaching over 12 weeks to dyads, biweekly (weeks 1, 3, 5,7, 9 &11) for 45 minutes

Participants will be instructed to use the Fitbit to monitor their partners' PA in addition to their own. All participants will be instructed to friend their health coach to enable real-time monitoring of PA to inform coaching zoom calls. The Fitbit will provide feedback on steps, active minutes, and calories burned. Participants will be asked to wear the device on most days and while they sleep.

Newsletters will be sent twice monthly during months 1-3 via email or text with an online link. Newsletters will be designed to share educational PA-related information from publicly available resources. Newsletters will also contain tips for overcoming barriers to PA ,finding time to exercise, low-cost ways to be active and being active with kids.Newsletters will also contain links to brief exercise routines that participants can do in their homes and information on low cost/free exercise classes in the community, which may help to overcome perceived access barriers

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* inactive SAI (Physical activity (PA) \<150 minutes/week) * physically able to engage in moderate PA * speak and read English; able to enroll with an eligible adult female partner who does not live in the same household * willing to use the Fitbit app/device * own a smartphone that is compatible with Fitbit software (up to 223.3 MB on iPhone or 165 MB on Android) 9) * able and willing to send and receive text messages * Blood pressure reading \<160/100 mm Hg, or with medical clearance.

Exclusion criteria

* SAI women with a current/planned pregnancy * cannot speak and read English * those participating in a PA or weight loss program * those diagnosed with a physical disability that interferes with their ability to be physically active. * not living in Houston, Texas

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility as Assessed by the Percentage of Participants Enrolled in the Study12 weeks
Feasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Complete the Study12 weeks
Feasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Complete All the Assessments12 weeksAssessments include counseling calls ,use of Fitbit, receipt and review of newsletters
Feasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Adhere to Treatment12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Self Support Subscale)Baseline, 12 weeksThe Social Support for Physical Activity survey assess the level of support for exercising from both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support subscale and study partner support subscale. The survey consists of two subscales: self-support and study partner support. Each subscale total score ranges from 13 to 104, with higher scores indicating greater social support. The self support subscale is reported.
Physical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Study Partner Subscale)Baseline, 12 weeksThe Climate questionnaire (autonomy support) asses the level of autonomy support provided by both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support and study partner support. The study partner subscale is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The sum of the 6 items were divided by 6, to generate a scale from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater autonomy support. The study partner subscale is reported.
Physical Activity (PA) as Assessed by the Modified Godin Leisure-Time Exercise QuestionnaireBaseline, 12 weeksA modified version of the validated Leisure Score Index from the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) was used to assess episodes, intensity, and duration of PA during a typical 7-day period within the past month. The modified GLTEQ asked the participants to recall the amount of time spent in strenuous, moderate, and mild physical activity for each day over seven days. Time spent in moderate and strenuous physical activity was summed to calculate minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity from the modified GLTEQ. Responses to the GLTEQ at each of the study assessments were converted to estimated weekly metabolic equivalent (METS). Responses on the LTEQ were converted into estimated weekly METS using a slightly modified version of the formula used by the developers of the GLTEQ: \[(total METS = minutes of strenuous exercise / 15) × 9\] + \[(total minutes of moderate exercise / 15) × 5\] + \[(total minutes of light exercise / 15) × 3\].
Cognitive Impairment as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)12 weeksTotal score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
Physical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Self Support Subscale)Baseline, 12 weeksThe Climate questionnaire (autonomy support) asses the level of autonomy support provided by both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support and study partner support. The self support subscale is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The sum of the 6 items were divided by 6, to generate a scale from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater autonomy support. The self support subscale reported.
Physical Activity as Assessed by the Average Steps Per Day Measured Via FitbitBaseline, 12 weeksThe average steps per day will be reported.
Self-efficacy for Physical Activity as Assessed by the Self-efficacy for Physical Activity (SEPA) ScaleBaseline, 12 weeksThe Self-efficacy for physical activity scale total score ranges from 5 to 25, a higher score indicating more confidence in one's ability to engage in physical activity
Physical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Study Partner Subscale)Baseline, 12 weeksThe Social Support for Physical Activity survey assess the level of support for exercising from both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support subscale and study partner support subscale. Each subscale total score ranges from 13 to 104, with higher scores indicating greater social support. The study partner support subscale is reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Twenty individuals (10 dyads) were enrolled in total: 10 participants, each enrolled with a study partner.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Health Coaching
Dyad-based Zoom health coaching: This will be delivered by a certified nurse coach, certified in holistic nursing who will provide 6 sessions of Zoom health coaching over 12 weeks to dyads, biweekly (weeks 1, 3, 5,7, 9 &11) for 45 minutes Fitbit activity monitor: Participants will be instructed to use the Fitbit to monitor their partners' PA in addition to their own. All participants will be instructed to friend their health coach to enable real-time monitoring of PA to inform coaching zoom calls. The Fitbit will provide feedback on steps, active minutes, and calories burned. Participants will be asked to wear the device on most days and while they sleep. Electronic newsletters: Newsletters will be sent twice monthly during months 1-3 via email or text with an online link. Newsletters will be designed to share educational PA-related information from publicly available resources. Newsletters will also contain tips for overcoming barriers to PA ,finding time to exercise, low-cost ways to be active and being active with kids.Newsletters will also contain links to brief exercise routines that participants can do in their homes and information on low cost/free exercise classes in the community, which may help to overcome perceived access barriers
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealth Coaching
Age, Continuous48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.19
Annual Household Income
$100,000 or more
17 Participants
Annual Household Income
$50,000 to $79,999
1 Participants
Annual Household Income
$80,000 to $99,999
2 Participants
Body Mass Index30.31 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.36
Education
Associates
1 Participants
Education
Bachelors
6 Participants
Education
Masters
11 Participants
Education
Professional
2 Participants
Number of Participants Employed20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
South Asian Indian
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Adhere to Treatment

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Health CoachingFeasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Adhere to Treatment18 Participants
Primary

Feasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Complete All the Assessments

Assessments include counseling calls ,use of Fitbit, receipt and review of newsletters

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Health CoachingFeasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Complete All the Assessments18 Participants
Primary

Feasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Complete the Study

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Health CoachingFeasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants Who Complete the Study20 Participants
Primary

Feasibility as Assessed by the Percentage of Participants Enrolled in the Study

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Health CoachingFeasibility as Assessed by the Percentage of Participants Enrolled in the Study100 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cognitive Impairment as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Health CoachingCognitive Impairment as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)25.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Secondary

Physical Activity as Assessed by the Average Steps Per Day Measured Via Fitbit

The average steps per day will be reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Health CoachingPhysical Activity as Assessed by the Average Steps Per Day Measured Via FitbitBaseline8,014 steps per day
Health CoachingPhysical Activity as Assessed by the Average Steps Per Day Measured Via Fitbit12 weeks7,885 steps per day
Secondary

Physical Activity (PA) as Assessed by the Modified Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire

A modified version of the validated Leisure Score Index from the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) was used to assess episodes, intensity, and duration of PA during a typical 7-day period within the past month. The modified GLTEQ asked the participants to recall the amount of time spent in strenuous, moderate, and mild physical activity for each day over seven days. Time spent in moderate and strenuous physical activity was summed to calculate minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity from the modified GLTEQ. Responses to the GLTEQ at each of the study assessments were converted to estimated weekly metabolic equivalent (METS). Responses on the LTEQ were converted into estimated weekly METS using a slightly modified version of the formula used by the developers of the GLTEQ: \[(total METS = minutes of strenuous exercise / 15) × 9\] + \[(total minutes of moderate exercise / 15) × 5\] + \[(total minutes of light exercise / 15) × 3\].

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Health CoachingPhysical Activity (PA) as Assessed by the Modified Godin Leisure-Time Exercise QuestionnaireBaseline23.85 Weekly metabolic equivalent (METS)Standard Deviation 33.6
Health CoachingPhysical Activity (PA) as Assessed by the Modified Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire12 weeks53.37 Weekly metabolic equivalent (METS)Standard Deviation 35.02
Secondary

Physical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Self Support Subscale)

The Climate questionnaire (autonomy support) asses the level of autonomy support provided by both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support and study partner support. The self support subscale is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The sum of the 6 items were divided by 6, to generate a scale from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater autonomy support. The self support subscale reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Health CoachingPhysical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Self Support Subscale)Baseline3.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Health CoachingPhysical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Self Support Subscale)12 weeks5.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Physical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Study Partner Subscale)

The Climate questionnaire (autonomy support) asses the level of autonomy support provided by both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support and study partner support. The study partner subscale is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The sum of the 6 items were divided by 6, to generate a scale from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater autonomy support. The study partner subscale is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Health CoachingPhysical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Study Partner Subscale)Baseline3.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Health CoachingPhysical Activity Related Autonomy Support as Assessed by the Climate Questionnaire (Autonomy Support - Study Partner Subscale)12 weeks6.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

Physical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Self Support Subscale)

The Social Support for Physical Activity survey assess the level of support for exercising from both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support subscale and study partner support subscale. The survey consists of two subscales: self-support and study partner support. Each subscale total score ranges from 13 to 104, with higher scores indicating greater social support. The self support subscale is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Data was not collected from 1 individual in the health coaching arm at 12 weeks because the participant did not fill out that portion of the survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Health CoachingPhysical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Self Support Subscale)Baseline14.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.36
Health CoachingPhysical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Self Support Subscale)12 weeks29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Secondary

Physical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Study Partner Subscale)

The Social Support for Physical Activity survey assess the level of support for exercising from both the individual (self) and their study partner. All participants completed both subscales: self-support subscale and study partner support subscale. Each subscale total score ranges from 13 to 104, with higher scores indicating greater social support. The study partner support subscale is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Health CoachingPhysical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Study Partner Subscale)Baseline16.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.27
Health CoachingPhysical Activity-related Social Support as Assessed by the Social Support for Physical Activity Survey (Study Partner Subscale)12 weeks31.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.01
Secondary

Self-efficacy for Physical Activity as Assessed by the Self-efficacy for Physical Activity (SEPA) Scale

The Self-efficacy for physical activity scale total score ranges from 5 to 25, a higher score indicating more confidence in one's ability to engage in physical activity

Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks

Population: Includes all twenty individuals enrolled (participants and their study partners).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Health CoachingSelf-efficacy for Physical Activity as Assessed by the Self-efficacy for Physical Activity (SEPA) ScaleBaseline11.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.25
Health CoachingSelf-efficacy for Physical Activity as Assessed by the Self-efficacy for Physical Activity (SEPA) Scale12 Weeks12.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.99

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026