Skip to content

A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics (Chronic Pain Trial)

A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05966142
Acronym
ADOPT PGx
Enrollment
1048
Registered
2023-07-28
Start date
2021-02-24
Completion date
2024-05-10
Last updated
2025-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Pharmacogenetic, CYP2D6, CYP2C19

Brief summary

This study is comprised of three separate pharmacogenetic trials grouped into a single protocol due to similarities in the intervention, the hypotheses, and the trial design. The three trials are the Acute Pain Trial, the Chronic Pain Trial, and the Depression Trial. Participants can enroll in only one of the three trials. All three trials were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT04445792. In July 2023 each of the three treatment trials was registered under a separate NCT# and NCT04445792 was converted to a screening record per recent guidance on master protocol research programs (MPRPs). This record is specific to the Chronic Pain Trial within the ADOPT-PGx protocol. The Chronic Pain Trial is a prospective, multicenter, two arm randomized pragmatic trial. Participants meeting eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to either immediate pharmacogenetic testing and genotype-guided opioid therapy (Intervention arm) or standard care with 6-month delayed pharmacogenetic testing (Control arm). The investigators will test the hypothesis that pharmacogenetic testing and genotype guided pain therapy improves pain control after surgery in participants who's body processes some pain medicines slower than normal.

Detailed description

Pain and depression are conditions that impact substantial proportions of the US population. Finding safe and effective drug therapies for both conditions is challenging. In the case of treatment for acute and chronic pain, the challenge is finding effective therapy while minimizing adverse effects or opioid addiction (and the ensuing consequences). For depression, there are few clinically relevant predictors of successful treatment leading to multiple trials of inadequate therapy for some patients. Both opioid and antidepressant prescriptions can be guided by pharmacogenetics (PGx) data based on existing guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). This study is designed to evaluate the impact of pharmacogenetic testing and genotype-guided pain or anti-depressant therapy on pain control or depression symptoms in a pragmatic setting. The rationale for examining a genotype-guided approach to acute and chronic pain management is based on the importance of CYP2D6 for the bioactivation of tramadol, codeine, and hydrocodone and data from a pilot study supporting improved pain control in intermediate and poor CYP2D6 metabolizers in the genotype-guided arm who are taking these drugs at baseline. Similarly, the rationale for examining a genotype-guided approach to depression medication therapy is based on the demonstrated role of CYP2D6 in the bio inactivation and CYP2C19 oxidation of select, commonly used SSRIs. Secondly, data from industry sponsored trials support the hypothesis of improved depression symptom control in a genotype-guided arm. Study objectives: Determine if a genotype-guided approach to pain therapy in participants with at least 3 months of chronic pain leads to improved pain control compared to usual care.

Interventions

Genetic testing of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19

Prescribing recommendations to the provider based on the pharmacogenetic testing results

Sponsors

National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Immediate vs. delayed pharmacogenetic testing and genotype-guided pain or depression therapy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Chronic Pain Trial * Age ≥ 18 years * English speaking or Spanish speaking * Seen at primary care clinics (such as, but not limited to, Internal Medicine, Family Medicine or Pediatrics) or patients seen in pain-relevant specialty clinics * History of pain for at least the last 3 months * Currently treated or being considered for treatment with tramadol, hydrocodone, or codeine to improve pain management

Exclusion criteria

Trial-wide: * Life expectancy less than 12 months * Are too cognitively impaired to provide informed consent and/or complete study protocol * Are institutionalized or too ill to participate (i.e. mental or nursing home facility or incarcerated) * Have a history of allogeneic stem cell transplant or liver transplant * People with prior clinical pharmacogenetic test results for genes relevant for the study in which they will enroll (CYP2D6 for the pain studies and CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 for depression) or already enrolled in an ADOPT PGx trial Chronic Pain * Plan to move out of the area within 6 months of enrollment * Undergoing treatment for an active cancer diagnosis * Currently taking daily opioids other than tramadol, codeine or hydrocodone

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain IntensityBaseline to 3 monthsThe composite pain intensity score is derived from the 3-time PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain intensity scale. Composite pain intensity score is the sum of the 3 questions and ranges from 3 (no pain) to 15 (intense pain). Change in composite pain intensity score ranges from -12 (change from the highest level of pain to the lowest level of pain) to 12 (change from the lowest level of pain to the highest level of pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Reduction MagnitudeBaseline to 3 monthsRatio of Composite Pain Score at 3 months relative to baseline. Composite pain intensity scores were shifted to range 0-12 and the pain reduction magnitude is reported as the ratio of pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline using this adjusted scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using the log ratio pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline. Due to the presence of 0 values in the ratios, the log ratios include a +.5 offset, i.e. log(3-month pain +.5 / baseline pain + 0.5).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain ReductionBaseline to 3 monthsClinically significant pain reduction defined as ratio of 3-month composite pain score relative to baseline is \< 0.7, corresponding to a 30% or more improvement in pain scores.
Prescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)3 monthsThe 7-item PROMIS questionnaire assesses the extent to which participant experience prescription pain medication misuse symptoms in the past 3 months using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants are asked if they have had a prescription for pain medication in the last 3 months. If no, the questionnaire is not administered, if yes, the questionnaire is administered. For the completed questionnaires. Raw scores ranging from 7 to 35. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using the PROMIS conversion table, with T-scores ranging 36.3 to 54.1. Higher T-scores reflect greater symptom severity.
Number of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance3 monthsConcordance between the participant reported opioid medications at 3 months and CYP2D6 phenotype.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This record is specific to the Chronic Pain Trial within the ADOPT PGx protocol. It only contains the participants consented to the Chronic Pain Trial.

Pre-assignment details

There were 1092 participants consented into the Chronic Pain trial. Of the 1092, 44 were not randomized into the trial and were not assigned to a treatment arm. The remaining 1048 consented participants were randomized and assigned into the treatment arms. The 1048 randomized participants will be described moving forward.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing
Immediate genetic testing of CYP2D6 and clinical decisions support for pain management prescribing to the healthcare provider.
527
Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx Testing
Delayed genetic testing of CYP2D6 and return of results after the conclusion of the 6-month follow-up period.
521
Total1,048

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath33
Overall StudyDuplicate Enrollment10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up5552
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyStudy Logistical Reason10
Overall StudyUnable to complete follow up due to change in health11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject98

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicChronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingTotalChronic Pain - Immediate PGx Testing
Age, Continuous57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants93 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
469 Participants937 Participants468 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
48 Participants97 Participants49 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
44 Participants97 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
75 Participants490 Participants66 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
521 Participants1048 Participants527 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
115 Participants210 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
146 Participants297 Participants151 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 5273 / 521
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5270 / 521
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5270 / 521

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Pain Intensity

The composite pain intensity score is derived from the 3-time PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain intensity scale. Composite pain intensity score is the sum of the 3 questions and ranges from 3 (no pain) to 15 (intense pain). Change in composite pain intensity score ranges from -12 (change from the highest level of pain to the lowest level of pain) to 12 (change from the lowest level of pain to the highest level of pain).

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population with completed baseline and 3-month pain surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingChange in Pain Intensity-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingChange in Pain Intensity-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
p-value: 0.591395% CI: [-0.42, 0.74]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain Reduction

Clinically significant pain reduction defined as ratio of 3-month composite pain score relative to baseline is \< 0.7, corresponding to a 30% or more improvement in pain scores.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population with completed baseline and 3-month pain surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain Reduction17 Participants
Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Pain Reduction27 Participants
p-value: 0.1228Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance

Concordance between the participant reported opioid medications at 3 months and CYP2D6 phenotype.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) participants with prescription pain medication data collected.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingNumber of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance33 Participants
Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingNumber of Participants With Drug-Gene Concordance36 Participants
p-value: 0.9657Chi-squared
Secondary

Pain Reduction Magnitude

Ratio of Composite Pain Score at 3 months relative to baseline. Composite pain intensity scores were shifted to range 0-12 and the pain reduction magnitude is reported as the ratio of pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline using this adjusted scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using the log ratio pain at 3 months relative to pain at baseline. Due to the presence of 0 values in the ratios, the log ratios include a +.5 offset, i.e. log(3-month pain +.5 / baseline pain + 0.5).

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population with completed baseline and 3-month pain surveys.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingPain Reduction Magnitude-0.1 log ratioStandard Deviation 0.4
Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingPain Reduction Magnitude-0.1 log ratioStandard Deviation 0.5
p-value: 0.6803t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Prescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)

The 7-item PROMIS questionnaire assesses the extent to which participant experience prescription pain medication misuse symptoms in the past 3 months using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants are asked if they have had a prescription for pain medication in the last 3 months. If no, the questionnaire is not administered, if yes, the questionnaire is administered. For the completed questionnaires. Raw scores ranging from 7 to 35. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using the PROMIS conversion table, with T-scores ranging 36.3 to 54.1. Higher T-scores reflect greater symptom severity.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) participants who indicate having taken a prescription for pain medication in the past 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Chronic Pain - Immediate PGx TestingPrescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)40.1 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.8
Chronic Pain - Delayed PGx TestingPrescription Pain Medication Misuse as Measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)40.5 T-scoreStandard Deviation 4.8
p-value: 0.525295% CI: [-1.7, 0.9]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026