Skip to content

Comparison of Two GIC's in the Restoration of Posterior Class II Lesions in the Primary Dentition

Comparison of Two Conventional Glass Ionomer Cements in the Restoration of Posterior Class II Lesion in the Primary Dentition: a Randomized Controlled Non Inferiority Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05965297
Enrollment
140
Registered
2023-07-28
Start date
2023-08-31
Completion date
2030-08-31
Last updated
2023-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Keywords

Primary Dentition, Glass ionomer cements, Posterior Class II restorations, DeltaFil, Riva Self Cure HV

Brief summary

This study will investigate the clinical performance of a novel restorative glass ionomer (DeltaFil, DMG) in comparison to an established restorative glass ionomer (Riva Self Cure HV, SDI) in the restoration of Class II cavities in primary molars.

Detailed description

Dental caries (tooth decay) remains one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. It is a dynamic and continuous process that, if uncontrolled, eventually leads to cavitation and the need for restorative treatment to maintain the form and function of the tooth.Today there are many possibilities for direct restorations, e.g. resin composites, compomers, resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) and glass ionomer cements (GICs), which all offer their own advantages and disadvantages. GIC are particularly suitable for treatments in young patients due to their high biocompatibility, fluoride release, less moisture and technique sensitivity as well as compatibility with Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) treatment. However, these materials have lower mechanical properties compared to other restorative materials, which negatively affects the survival rate when placed in load bearing areas. Fracture, loss and wear being the most common causes for failure. This randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial aims to evaluate the performance of the new restorative glass ionomer DeltaFil, that offers an increased fracture toughness, in comparison to an established restorative glass-ionomer (Riva Self Cure HV).

Interventions

DEVICEDeltaFil

Cavities are prepared using rotary instruments/diamond burs. Afterwards, the cavity is conditioned (using DeltaFil conditioner) and cleaned, with subsequent insertion of a conventional restorative glass-ionomer (DeltaFil). During the curing phase and after finishing Riva Coat will be applied to all restoration surfaces for moisture protection.

DEVICERiva Self Cure HV

Cavities are prepared using rotary instruments/diamond burs. Afterwards, the cavity is conditioned (using Riva conditioner) and cleaned, with subsequent insertion of a conventional restorative glass-ionomer (Riva Self Cure HV). During the curing phase and after finishing Riva Coat will be applied to all restoration surfaces for moisture protection.

Sponsors

University of Coimbra
CollaboratorOTHER
University Arthur Sá Earp Neto
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
DMG Dental Material Gesellschaft mbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Noninferiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 1 and up to 3 primary molars with either International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) lesions stage 2-5 or preexisting restorations requiring placement/replacement of Class II restorations * Defects limited to occlusal-proximal surface, with cavity sizes smaller than 3 mm mesio-distally and 3 mm in the occluso-cervical and bucco-lingual directions measured with a World Health Organization (WHO)-graded periodontal probe * Teeth should have both adjoining and their antagonist teeth present. After restoration the restored tooth should enable appropriate proximal contacts on both mesial and distal surfaces after setting of the class II restoration and be in occlusion with the antagonist tooth * Good access * Good general health (ASA I, II) * Good oral hygiene (OHI-S \< 1.9) * Guardians have given informed consent * Child is cooperative and assented

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy/ sensitivity to GIC or other materials used in this study * Space maintainers or orthodontic appliances * Tooth has a caries lesion or restoration other than those included in the study * Tooth has pathological mobility * Tooth has preexisting developmental defects * Tooth with pulp exposure or indication for endodontic treatment * Pain, fistula or abscess related to the selected tooth * Obvious signs of parafunctional habits (e.g. bruxism) * Participation in another study * Incapable to participate in the recall visits at the university hospital

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival rate of Class II restorations24 monthsRestorations are clinically assessed using the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria. A surviving restoration is defined as a restoration that is still present at the time of evaluation and has no individual FDI criteria with a score of 5 (clinically poor).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival rate of Class II restorations6, 12, 36, 48 and 60 monthsRestorations are clinically assessed using the FDI criteria. A surviving restoration is defined as a restoration that is still present at the time of evaluation and has no individual FDI criteria with a score of 5 (clinically poor).
Individual FDI parameter assessmentBaseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 monthsRestorations are clinically assessed using the FDI criteria. Specifically, the following criteria are assessed individually on a scale from 1 very good to 5 clinicially poor: Esthetic properties (Surface Luster; Surface Staining; Color Match; Anatomical Form); Functional properties (Fractures and Retention; Wear; Approximal Contact Point and Contour; Patient view); Biological properties (Postoperative Hypersensitivity & Tooth Vitality; Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction; Periodontal Response; Tooth Integrity;Adjacent mucosa)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caries ExperienceBaseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 monthsTo assess caries experience the dmft score will be recorded. dmft refers to the number of primary teeth (t) with either decay (d), missing due to caries (m) or a filling (f).
Oral HygieneBaseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 monthsOral hygiene will be assessed using the Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S).

Countries

Brazil, Portugal

Contacts

Primary ContactMarcus Cebula, Dr.
mcebula@mtcompanies.com+494084006
Backup ContactSusanne Effenberger, Dr.
seffenberger@mtcompanies.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026