Skip to content

Phenotypic Classification of FMR With CMR

Improving Phenotypic Classification and Prediction of Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05965258
Enrollment
360
Registered
2023-07-28
Start date
2023-08-29
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2025-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, Nonischemic Congestive Cardiomyopathy

Brief summary

The goal of the current research is to develop personalized risk prediction for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) patients through explainable unsupervised phenomapping enriched with advanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging biomarkers, and to determine the CMR predictors of reverse remodeling following modern therapies for FMR. The prospective study entails aiming to recruit 360 adult patients (ages \>18 years) with EF 10-50% and FMR RF\> 20%, who are clinically referred for CMR evaluation. Patients who enroll in our study will be referred for optimization of mGDMT and will undergo follow-up CMR studies at 6months. NICM patients who are fully medically optimized with significant FMR at the time of the baseline CMR and are referred for Mitraclip treatment will undergo follow-up CMR 6 months from Mitraclip intervention. NICM patients referred for mGDMT optimization, but have persistent or progressive FMR at the time of 6 month follow-up CMR and referred for Mitraclip therapy, will undergo a 2nd follow-up CMR 6 months from Mitraclip therapy.

Detailed description

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) portends a bleak prognosis and is a common consequence of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, NICM), where adverse annular and left ventricular (LV) remodeling and/or infarction alters mitral valve (MV) function. Prior studies demonstrate significant increases in mortality risk as severity of FMR increases; mortality rates range from 15-40% at 1 year. Furthermore, as the prevalence of heart failure (HF) is rising, FMR is projected to double from over 2 million patients in 2000 to over 4 million patients in the United States by 2030. Defining FMR severity, optimal timing of intervention, and most appropriate method for intervention remain controversial. Recently, MITRA-FR and COAPT trials demonstrated contrasting survival benefit with percutaneous MV repair, demonstrating the importance and need for more optimal selection criteria. Currently, the patient selection criteria for Mitraclip therapy are solely based on MV anatomy and controversial echocardiographic criteria for FMR severity. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides an exciting opportunity to address numerous unmet needs regarding characterizing FMR and the need for more optimal selection criteria for improving outcomes. Superior accuracy and reproducibility for quantification of LV size and function, and gold standard tissue characterization, positions CMR as the ideal imaging modality for comprehensively characterizing FMR and the underlying myopathic processes that significantly impact response to FMR therapies. The goal of the current research is to develop personalized risk prediction for FMR patients through explainable unsupervised phenomapping enriched with advanced CMR imaging biomarkers, and to determine the CMR predictors of reverse remodeling following modern therapies for FMR. The proposed research will leverage a large retrospective single center NICM CMR database. Our CMR NICM database currently features 458 NICM patients, who underwent CMR on a single CMR vendor platform from 2008-2017, who have been extensively curated with contoured data for standard CMR measures. An additional 802 NICM patients have been identified from our 2018-2021 CMR database with EF\<50% with the same inclusion/exclusion criteria, which will be extensively curated to enable phenomapping discovery. An external 400 NICM patient cohort will be used as an external validation cohort. The prospective study entails aiming to recruit 360 adult patients (ages \>18 years) with EF 10-50% and FMR RF\> 20%, who are clinically referred for CMR evaluation. Patients who enroll in our study will be referred for optimization of mGDMT with Heart Failure Pharmacist Clinic and followed every 2 weeks until optimized. All will return and undergo follow-up CMR studies at 6months. NICM patients who are fully medically optimized with significant FMR at the time of the baseline CMR and are referred for Mitraclip treatment will undergo follow-up CMR 6 months from Mitraclip intervention. NICM patients referred for mGDMT optimization, but have persistent or progressive FMR at the time of 6 month follow-up CMR and referred for Mitraclip therapy, will undergo a 2nd follow-up CMR 6 months from Mitraclip therapy. CMR will be done on dedicated cardiac research MRI scanner. A ischemic cardiomyopathy subgroup will be assessed as a comparator cohort.

Interventions

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 6 months. If referred to MitraClip, CMR will be performed at 6 months from the procedure.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

1 CMR LVEF \<55% 2.FMR Fraction\>20% or echo criteria consistent with at least moderate mitral regurgitation with adequate image quality

Exclusion criteria

1. \>moderate aortic regurgitation/stenosis, 2. \<18 years of age, 3. acute myocarditis, 4. eGFR\<15 5. HCM 6. cardiac amyloidosis/sarcoidosis 7. prior mitral valve intervention 8. myocardial infarction within 8 weeks of CMR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of cardiac mortality, heart transplant, or LVAD implantation.Up to 36 monthsOccurrence of cardiac mortality and/or heart transplant and/or LVAD implantation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in NT-proBNP6 months30% change in NT-proBNP or decrease to level \< 1000 compared to baseline
Change in KCQL score6 months5 point change in KCQL score compared to baseline
Change in 6-minute walk test6 months25 meter change in 6-minute walk test compared to baseline
Recurrent heart failure hospitalizationup to 1 yearOccurrence of heart failure related hospitalization
Arrhythmiasup to 1 yearOccurrence of arrhythmia
Change in FMR6 monthsa change of \>5 units/percentage points compared to baseline
Strokeup to 1 yearOccurrence of stroke
Heart transplantup to 1 yearOccurrence of heart transplant
LVAD implantationup to 1 yearOccurrence of implant of left ventricular assisted device (LVAD)
Mortalityup to 1 yearOccurrence of mortality
MIup to 1 yearOccurrence of myocardial infarction

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDeborah Kwon, MD
kwond@ccf.org216-444-8526

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026