Skip to content

Optimizing Phototesting and Investigating Photobiology of Visible Light

Optimizing Phototesting and Investigating Photobiology of Visible Light

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05964907
Enrollment
14
Registered
2023-07-28
Start date
2021-10-06
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

Specific Aim 1: To determine the impact of spectral composition of the VL+UVA1 source on the associated biologic effects. Specific Aim 2: To investigate differential responses of subjects with different skin phototypes to VL+UVA1, including immediate and delayed erythema and pigmentation, and photodamage.

Detailed description

The design of the study consists of a total of 4 visits within a two week period. The first visit consists of VL+UVA1 irradiation with different light source on the opposite site of patients' back. A combination of non-invasive measurements (e.g., photography, redness and color changes of the skin using colorimetry and diffuse reflectance spectrometry) will be conducted throughout the 4 visits. Biopsies will be taken at various time points.

Interventions

DEVICELight Source B: Visible Light solar simulator (VL + UVA1)

Patients will be radiated with light source B (Visible light solar simulator)

DEVICELight Source A: Visible Light solar simulator closer match to sunlight (VL +UVA1)

Patients will be radiated with light source A (Visible light solar simulator closer match to sunlight)

Sponsors

Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy individuals age 18 and older * Fitzpatrick skin phototype (SPT) I-VI, 7 with SPT I-III and 7 with SPT IV-VI, with normal healthy skin * Able to understand the requirements of the study and its associated risks * Able to complete and sign a consent form * Willing and able to refrain from any medications or herbal supplements during the duration of the study, unless permitted by the investigator * Agrees to refrain from using any new topical skin care products, laundry detergents, or fragrances while participating in the study * Has not had excessive sun exposure for 7 days prior to enrollment in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Recent history of vitiligo, melasma, and other disorders of pigmentation with the exception of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation * History of relevant skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis, eczema, or sunburn on any part of the body * History of photodermatoses or photosensitivity disorders * History of melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancers * Use of tanning parlors or exposure of the irradiated sites to sun light during the duration of the study * Use of topical or systemic treatment that is likely to interfere with assessment, study results, or pose safety concerns * Subjects with a tendency to bleed excessively * Known allergies to anesthetics (lidocaine) or anaphylaxis treatment (epinephrine) * History of hypertrophic scarring or keloid formation * Use of any photosensitizing medication within the visible light range or additional medication at the discretion of the investigator \[examples include - but not limited to - thiazide diuretics, regular use of NSAIDs, hydroxychloroquine, or voriconazole * A woman who is lactating, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Erythema assessment for all 14 participants.Visit 1 (Day 0)Measured clinically with Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale IGA Description of Erythema (Redness) 0 Clear of erythema 1. Almost clear of erythema 2. Mild, but noticeable erythema 3. Moderate erythema (pink), no sharp borders 4. Severe erythema (dark pink), sharp borders 5. Very severe erythema (very dark pink to almost red)
Erythema assessment for all participantsVisit 2 (Day 1)Measured clinically with Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale IGA Description of Erythema (Redness) 0 Clear of erythema 1. Almost clear of erythema 2. Mild, but noticeable erythema 3. Moderate erythema (pink), no sharp borders 4. Severe erythema (dark pink), sharp borders 5. Very severe erythema (very dark pink to almost red)
Erythema assessmentVisit 3 (Day 7)Measured clinically with Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale IGA Description of Erythema (Redness) 0 Clear of erythema 1. Almost clear of erythema 2. Mild, but noticeable erythema 3. Moderate erythema (pink), no sharp borders 4. Severe erythema (dark pink), sharp borders 5. Very severe erythema (very dark pink to almost red)
Erythema assessment for 14 participantsVisit 4 (Day 14)Measured clinically with Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale IGA Description of Erythema (Redness) 0 Clear of erythema 1. Almost clear of erythema 2. Mild, but noticeable erythema 3. Moderate erythema (pink), no sharp borders 4. Severe erythema (dark pink), sharp borders 5. Very severe erythema (very dark pink to almost red)
Erythema assessment for all 14 participantsVisit 1 (Day 0)Both colorimetry and DRS non-invasively provide quantitative objective information regarding changes in skin color by quantifying skin hyperpigmentation and erythema as L\* and a\* by colorimeter, and as melanin, oxy-hemoglobin concentration by DRS respectively. ITA can be derived from L\* and b\* by using ITA = \[arctan (L\* - 50)/b\*\] X 180/Π)\]. Colorimetry: Decrease in L\* and ITA indicates greater pigmentation. Increase in a\* indicates increase in Erythema. All these parameters are relative with arbitrary units DRS: Increase in Melanin content will indicate increase in pigmentation and increase in oxy-hemoglobin will indicate increase in erythema. All these parameters are relative with arbitrary units
Pigmentation assessment for all 14 participants.Visit 1 (day 0)Measured clinically with Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale IGA Description of Pigmentation (Tanning) 0 Clear of hyperpigmentation 1. Almost clear of hyperpigmentation 2. Mild, but noticeable hyperpigmentation 3. Moderate hyperpigmentation (medium brown) 4. Severe hyperpigmentation (dark brown) 5. Very severe hyperpigmentation (very dark brown to almost black)
Pigmentation assessment for all 14Visit 2 (Day 1)Measured clinically with Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale IGA Description of Pigmentation (Tanning) 0 Clear of hyperpigmentation 1. Almost clear of hyperpigmentation 2. Mild, but noticeable hyperpigmentation 3. Moderate hyperpigmentation (medium brown) 4. Severe hyperpigmentation (dark brown) 5. Very severe hyperpigmentation (very dark brown to almost black)
Pigmentation assessment for 14 participantsVisit 3 (Day 7)Measured clinically with Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale IGA Description of Pigmentation (Tanning) 0 Clear of hyperpigmentation 1. Almost clear of hyperpigmentation 2. Mild, but noticeable hyperpigmentation 3. Moderate hyperpigmentation (medium brown) 4. Severe hyperpigmentation (dark brown) 5. Very severe hyperpigmentation (very dark brown to almost black)
Pigmentation assessment for all 14 participants..Visit 1 (day 0)Both colorimetry and DRS non-invasively provide quantitative objective information regarding changes in skin color by quantifying skin hyperpigmentation and erythema as L\* and a\* by colorimeter, and as melanin, oxy-hemoglobin concentration by DRS respectively. ITA can be derived from L\* and b\* by using ITA = \[arctan (L\* - 50)/b\*\] X 180/Π)\]. Colorimetry: Decrease in L\* and ITA indicates greater pigmentation. Increase in a\* indicates increase in Erythema. All these parameters are relative with arbitrary units DRS: Increase in Melanin content will indicate increase in pigmentation and increase in oxy-hemoglobin will indicate increase in erythema. All these parameters are relative with arbitrary units
Pigmentation assessment for all 14 participantsVisit 2 (Day 1)Both colorimetry and DRS non-invasively provide quantitative objective information regarding changes in skin color by quantifying skin hyperpigmentation and erythema as L\* and a\* by colorimeter, and as melanin, oxy-hemoglobin concentration by DRS respectively. ITA can be derived from L\* and b\* by using ITA = \[arctan (L\* - 50)/b\*\] X 180/Π)\]. Colorimetry: Decrease in L\* and ITA indicates greater pigmentation. Increase in a\* indicates increase in Erythema. All these parameters are relative with arbitrary units DRS: Increase in Melanin content will indicate increase in pigmentation and increase in oxy-hemoglobin will indicate increase in erythema. All these parameters are relative with arbitrary units

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immunohistochemical changes in pigmentation, inflammation, and profileration, for all 14 participantsVisit 1 (Day 0)Histology assess parameter including pigmentation, inflammation and proliferation.
RNA sequencing for 8 participantsVisit 2 (Day 1)Molecular changes- sample collection for RNA sequencing

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORIndermeet Kohli, PhD

Henry Ford Health Dermatology Research

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026