Skip to content

Assessment of Sleep Quality of Hospitalized Patients Treated With EEG-guided Protection Procedures: Application in Intensive Care Unit

Assessment of Sleep Quality of Hospitalized Patients Treated With EEG-guided Protection Procedures: Application in Intensive Care Unit. (SleepScan)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05963672
Acronym
SleepScan
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-07-27
Start date
2023-08-08
Completion date
2024-07-20
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critically Ill Patient, Intensive Care Unit, Sleep Quality

Brief summary

Sleep of critically ill patients is highly disturbed with a high sleep fragmentation; patients spend most of their sleep in very short sleep episodes, lasting less than 10 minutes. Causes of theses sleep alterations are complex including environmental noise (alarms, beepers, conversations…), continuous light, nurse care and repetitive measures of vital parameters. Numerous studies have reported a relationship between severe sleep alterations and a prolonged weaning period and mortality. Improving sleep quality in critically ill patients is a major challenge to promote ICU patient's recovery. A very promising treatment is the application of a nocturnal quiet-time during which non urgent care, comfort care, systematic measures of vital parameters are delayed and clustered in order to limit room entries. However, quiet time procedures have failed to improve sleep quality to date. A miniaturized medical device recording one EEG channel and embedding an automated sleep scoring algorithm running in real-time was devised. This device (positioned on forehead, and continuously recording noise and light levels) indicates if the patient is awake or asleep using a tablet positioned at doorstep of the room, so that nurses know if patient is sleeping, without entering the room. Hypothesis proposes that applying sleep protection procedures (clustering cares, limiting room entries, reducing lights and noise, delaying non urgent care…) when patients are sleeping (= EEG-guided strategies) will increase patients sleep quality. This study will assess the effect of such device on sleep quality in ICU patients. This is a before / after design. The first group (control group), will be recorded but the sleep scoring will not be displayed by the tablet and patient will be expose to standard care. Then, procedure will be established collegially with nurses, nurses assistants and doctors. Then, the second group (treated group) will be recorded with the device displaying the status of the patient (asleep/awake) and all caregivers will be asked to follow the established rules (EEG-guided sleep protection rules)

Interventions

DEVICEEEG-guided sleep protection

The tablet will display a specific picture prioritize sleep or prioritize care depending on the patient status determined by the algorithm. When the picture favor/prioritize sleep is displayed, all caregivers and visiting family are asked to follow the sleep protection rules: refrain to enter the room for not urgent reasons, switch off television, reduced light in the room/corridor, reduce noise in front of the door, close curtain (if any), and delay non urgent care…etc; if caregivers have to enter the room, headlight and/or additional light will be favored. All these rules will be established collegially by nurses and doctors. Obviously, urgent care and reactions to alarms are maintained. When the picture favor/prioritize care is displayed, all caregivers and visiting family are invited to perform non urgent care, cleaning, restocking perfusion needles, comfort care, visiting.

OTHERControl condition

the recording device will be placed on the patient to record sleep but the tablet will be masked and placed face down on the bench in the room, invisible from the door.

Sponsors

Poitiers University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults admitted in medical ICU of University Hospital of Poitiers * Un-sedated patients displaying a RASS scale between -2 and +1 * Intubated or spontaneously breathing patients * Patient or family have signed the inform consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a central nervous system disease altering sleep scoring * Patients who received drugs (\<24h) modifying significantly EEG and sleep scoring * Patients with cutaneous erosion of the scalp

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep qualityDay 1 to Day 4Proportion of continuous sleep

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep fragmentationDay 1 to Day 4Number of awakenings and micro-awakenings per hour of sleep
Environmental noise and environmental lightDay 1 to Day 4Number of peak noise end time spent above 20 lux
Sleep interruptions by caregiversDay 1 to Day 4Number of room entries while patient is asleep
Sleep qualityDay 2 to Day 4Proportion of continuous sleep
Patient AgitationDay 1 to day 4Number of patients with diminishing (-1 point) Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score. 10 Agitation-Sedation scale items From +4 (combative) to -5 (non-recoverable)
Performance of the algorithmDay 1 to Day 4Number of sleep episodes lasting more than 10 min correctly identified by algorithm (versus vision scoring)
Workload assessed by nursesDay 1 to Day 4Score at specific scale assessing workload. From 1- no workload to 10- significant additional workload.
Anxiety levelDay 1 to day 4Score at Spielberger Y-A scale.It consist of 12 questions, each rated on a scale with 4 response options. Lower score means a minimal anxiety level.
Respiratory statusAt Unit care discharge, an average of 14 daysWeaning duration (number of days), ventilator free days and respiratory status at discharge
Presence of deliriumDay 1 to Day 4Number of days with positive Confusion Assessment Method(CAM)-ICU scale. It is made up of 4 criteria. The test is POSITIVE (confusion present) if 1 and 2 + 3 or 4 are met.
Unit Care length of stayAt Unit care discharge, an average of 14 daysNumber of days in ICU
Safety of the procedureOne day after Unit Care discharge, an average of 15 daysNumbers of Serious adverse events and Material defect events
Sleep continuityDay 1 to Day 4Part of sleep time past in more than 10 minutes episodes
Patient reported sleep qualityDay 1 to day 4Score et richards-Campbell sleep questionnaire. It consist of 6 questions, each question scored from 0 to 100. Higher score mean the better sleep

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026