Skip to content

EarGenie: Assessment of a Minimum Viable Product

EarGenie: Assessment of a Minimum Viable Product

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05962814
Enrollment
11
Registered
2023-07-27
Start date
2023-08-14
Completion date
2024-02-26
Last updated
2025-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Impaired Children

Keywords

fNIRS, Early intervention

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of a novel device (EarGenie MVP) to assess hearing function in infants, using a small number of infants with normal hearing. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is our device safe? * Does the device provide preliminary results consistent with previous results from a commercial functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) research device? Participants will attend one test session and have their hearing assessed with the EarGenie MVP device.

Detailed description

This is a first-in-human study to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of our prototype hearing assessment system (EarGenie MVP). EarGenie MVP uses fNIRS technology to assess an infant's brain response to hearing speech sounds, or discriminating between different speech sounds. It includes software to automatically run analysis in real time, and has a user interface allowing clinicians to operate the tests and receive result reports. The test methods and analysis software have been developed using our commercial fNIRS research system, but the EarGenie MVP has been designed for easy use in paediatric audiology clinics. 10 infants with normal hearing will be recruited for the study, and undergo one test session each with the EarGenie MVP. Safety data will be documented and the results of the tests examined to see if they are consistent with the results expected from our experience using the commercial device in 36 infants with normal hearing.

Interventions

The EarGenie test consists of placing the EarGenie headgear on the infant and running the fNIRS tests via the user interface. Blocks of speech sounds are presented to the infant via earphones or via speaker, and the EarGenie MVP measures changes in the blood oxygenation. Automatic analyses are run to determine whether the infant heard the sounds or discriminated between them. The infant will be in a natural sleep when the fNIRS test is run. Prior to the test, standard audiometric procedures (otoscopy and tympanometry) will confirm normal middle ear function.

Sponsors

The Bionics Institute of Australia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A single group of infants without hearing impairment will be recruited so that safety and preliminary efficacy can be determined.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 24 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Is between the ages of 1 and 24 months at the time of fNIRS testing. * Has no known hearing loss * Has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf.

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination ResponsesEach infant has one test session, lasting up to to hours. Outcome measures are determined after the last infant has been tested.Evidence of device feasibility will be obtained by comparing the test results obtained using EarGenie MVP to our existing test results for a larger number of infants obtained with a commercial device NIRx (McKay et al. 2023. A Reliable, Accurate, and Clinic-friendly Objective Test of Speech Sound Detection and Discrimination in Sleeping Infants. PsyArXiv. June 20. doi:10.31234/osf.io/fbwcm). For each infant, the presence of a significant response is determined by the incorporated automatic analysis software, and further visually supported for the tester by checking that the shape of the response waveform is consistent with those found in the previous data set. We will consider the feasibility as confirmed if not more than 1(/10) infants (or 10%) have an absent detection response at 65 dB SPL, and not more than 3 (/10) babies (or 30%) show an absent discrimination response for Ba versus Ga.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Adverse effects are noted during, and for 24 hours following the single test session of the infant. Incidence of events is calculated after the last infant is tested.Safety assessment will be undertaken as follows. Any adverse event (as defined using standard definitions) will be documented in each infant's case report, and reported using standard required procedures. Each infant's case report will also include details of any minor non-reportable occurrences only relevant to comfort of use such as discomfort signs in the infant, or any temporary visual skin marks left by the headgear after the test. If any major adverse effect occurs, the trial will be stopped until the such time as the issue is resolved.

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

11 Participants were recruited via word of mouth between August 2023 and February 2024.

Pre-assignment details

One infant was found to have middle ear disfunction on the tympanometry test, and so was excluded from the study and did not complete an fNIRS test

Participants by arm

ArmCount
fNIRS
Infants who have a test completed with EarGenie MVP in a single test session EarGenie MVP test: The EarGenie test consists of placing the EarGenie headgear on the infant and running the fNIRS tests via the user interface. Blocks of speech sounds are presented to the infant via earphones or via speaker, and the EarGenie MVP measures changes in the blood oxygenation. Automatic analyses are run to determine whether the infant heard the sounds or discriminated between them. The infant will be in a natural sleep when the fNIRS test is run. Prior to the test, standard audiometric procedures (otoscopy and tympanometry) will confirm normal middle ear function.
10
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studyfailed eligibility1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicfNIRS
Age, Customized
1-24 months
10 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Prevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination Responses

Evidence of device feasibility will be obtained by comparing the test results obtained using EarGenie MVP to our existing test results for a larger number of infants obtained with a commercial device NIRx (McKay et al. 2023. A Reliable, Accurate, and Clinic-friendly Objective Test of Speech Sound Detection and Discrimination in Sleeping Infants. PsyArXiv. June 20. doi:10.31234/osf.io/fbwcm). For each infant, the presence of a significant response is determined by the incorporated automatic analysis software, and further visually supported for the tester by checking that the shape of the response waveform is consistent with those found in the previous data set. We will consider the feasibility as confirmed if not more than 1(/10) infants (or 10%) have an absent detection response at 65 dB SPL, and not more than 3 (/10) babies (or 30%) show an absent discrimination response for Ba versus Ga.

Time frame: Each infant has one test session, lasting up to to hours. Outcome measures are determined after the last infant has been tested.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
fNIRSPrevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination Responsessignificant detection response to BA at 65 dB SPLwith4 Participants
fNIRSPrevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination Responsessignificant detection response to BA at 65 dB SPLwithout6 Participants
fNIRSPrevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination Responsessignificant discrimination response to BA/GA contrastwith1 Participants
fNIRSPrevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination Responsessignificant discrimination response to BA/GA contrastwithout9 Participants
fNIRSPrevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination ResponsesResponse morphologies consitent with morphologies of research devicewith10 Participants
fNIRSPrevalence of Significant fNIRS Detection and Discrimination ResponsesResponse morphologies consitent with morphologies of research devicewithout0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]

Safety assessment will be undertaken as follows. Any adverse event (as defined using standard definitions) will be documented in each infant's case report, and reported using standard required procedures. Each infant's case report will also include details of any minor non-reportable occurrences only relevant to comfort of use such as discomfort signs in the infant, or any temporary visual skin marks left by the headgear after the test. If any major adverse effect occurs, the trial will be stopped until the such time as the issue is resolved.

Time frame: Adverse effects are noted during, and for 24 hours following the single test session of the infant. Incidence of events is calculated after the last infant is tested.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
fNIRSIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Adverse eventswith0 Participants
fNIRSIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]Adverse eventswithout10 Participants
fNIRSIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]no impression marks on skin, or impression marks that resolved within 3 hourswith10 Participants
fNIRSIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]no impression marks on skin, or impression marks that resolved within 3 hourswithout0 Participants
fNIRSIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]signs of distress during test such as cryingwith0 Participants
fNIRSIncidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]signs of distress during test such as cryingwithout10 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026