Skip to content

Primary Stability of Immediate Implant Using Versah Versus Conventional Burs

Primary Stability of Immediate Dental Implant Using Osseodensification and Conventional Burs (A Randomized a Clinical Comparative Prospective Study)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05960916
Enrollment
17
Registered
2023-07-27
Start date
2022-01-22
Completion date
2023-08-01
Last updated
2023-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

Brief summary

This study is designed as a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trail, Evaluate the effect of osseodensification technique on primary stability in comparison to the conventional drilling technique in immediate single fresh extraction sockets.

Detailed description

In this study, 30 dental implants inserted immediately after tooth extraction (not a multi-rooted tooth) as a two groups according to bur drill technique and measure the primary stability by osstell devise based on resonance frequency analysis (RFA) value which is scaled from 1-100, after 16 weeks measuring the secondary stability.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDensah® burs

Osseodensification is a non-excavating implant site preparation technique, it creates a densified layer of surrounding bone through compaction autografting while simultaneously plastically expanding the bony ridge at the same time facilitating for placement of large diameter implants and also avoiding fenestration and dehiscence defects.

Conventional burs is the gold standard that used to prepare the osteotomy site by drilling of the bone and creating a bed for implant placement, it is used according to the manufacturer instructions.

Sponsors

University of Baghdad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Dividing two groups according drill type and parallelly measured during study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy and medically fit patients * Patients age ≥18 years for both gender * Apical bone ≥ 2mm from vertical structure showed in x-rays. * Patient has tooth or teeth with single root anterior and\\or posterior area cannot * restored by another dental treatment procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with active periodontal disease. * Pregnancy or lactation. * A local or systemic disorder that is contraindicated for the minor surgical procedure * and may affect healing process. * Any irradiation in head and neck area. * Heavy smoking habit.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)baseline value of implant stability measured immediately after implant installation (primary stability)immediately after implant placement the ISQ value measured by RFA device (Osstell)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ)Changes in implant stability after 16 weeks (secondary stability) from baseline value measured immediately after implant placement (primary stability)16 weeks after implant placement, ISQ value measured by RFA device (Osstell)

Countries

Iraq

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026