Effects of; Movement of Teeth Assiste Wit MOPS and I-prf
Conditions
Brief summary
The present clinical comparative study will be undertaken for assessment of two different modalities of maxillary canine retraction assisted with microosteoperforations versus injectable platelet rich fibrin.
Detailed description
Group I: will include 9 patients who willreceive MOPs with maxillary canine retraction that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol. ▪ Group II: will include 9 patients receive i-PRF that will be performed on intervention sides according to a standardized protocol.
Interventions
COMBINATION_PRODUCTinjectable platelet rich fibrin versus microosteoperforation
injectable platelet rich fibrin which is second product of blood versus microosteoperforation which is surgical procedure
Sponsors
Al-Azhar University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 22 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. An age ranges from 15-22 years. 2. Severe crowding or protrusion requiring 1st premolars extractions followed by symmetrical canine retraction. 3. All permanent teeth present, 3rd molars are excluded. 4. Good oral and general health. 5. No systemic disease/medication that could interfere with OTM. 6. No previous orthodontic treatment.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient diagnosed to have an indication for non-extraction approach. 2. Poor oral hygiene or periodontally compromised patient. 3. Patient with craniofacial anomalies or previous history of trauma, bruxism or parafunctions. 4. Previous orthodontic treatment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Direct clinical assessment of the amount of maxillary canine retraction i.e. amount of extraction space closure before and after four months observation period and on every 28 days observation period according to standardized method | 4months | Direct clinical assessment of the amount of maxillary canine retraction i.e. amount of extraction space closure before and after four months observation and every 28 days period and on every 28 days observation period according to standardized method. 2. Study cast assessment: • The amount of maxillary canine retraction on both sides will be measured immediately before starting canine retraction and at each observation interval by using a software for the scanned models according to standardized method |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed