Dental Caries
Conditions
Keywords
dental loupe, restoration success, FDI criteria
Brief summary
This study aimed to investigate the effect of using a loupe and dental operating microscope with different magnifications on the success of class II direct composite restorations.
Detailed description
A total of 130 class II, D2 deep caries teeth of 85 patients were randomly distributed to the naked eye, 3x magnification loupe, 5x magnification loupe, 8.5x magnification dental operating microscope (DOM) groups, and direct composite restorations were made with these magnification aids. carried out. Clearfil SE Bond 2 and Clearfil Majesty Posterior composite were used in all restorations. The restorations were evaluated using FDI criteria at 1,6 and 12-month periods, and restorations were scored between 1 and 5 for all criteria.
Interventions
DEVICEDental Loupe
Magnification aid
DEVICEDental Operation Microscope
Magnification aid
Sponsors
Ataturk University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
It has 4 groups in total. The treatments were carried out * with no magnification aid * with x2 loupe * with x5 loupe * with Dental operation microscope
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Good oral and dental care of the patient, * The need for at least 1 Class II restoration at a depth of D2 in the posterior group teeth, * No crowding in the tooth to be restored, tooth contact and antagonist, * The relevant tooth is vital, * Absence of pain on percussion and palpation of the tooth. * Absence of any pathology in the periapical tissues in radiographic evaluation, * The patient was informed about the study and accepted the study, * Having agreed to attend 1 month, 6 month and 12 month control sessions, * The patient has no systemic disease,
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of severe periodontal disease, * Teeth that cannot be insulated, malposed or overloaded or not loaded at all, * Periodontal and endodontic removal of the relevant tooth is healthy, * the patient is undergoing orthodontic treatment, * Recording of dry mouth is set, * Severe bruxism habit, * Smoking
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Restoration Success using FDI Criteria | a week after dental treatment | FDI criteria were categorized into three groups \[3\]: esthetic (four criteria), functional (three criteria) and biological (one criterion) parameters |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed