Skip to content

The Different Design of Orthokeratology

The Effectiveness and Safety of Different Design of Orthokeratology Lenses to Reduce Myopia Growth

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05956704
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-07-21
Start date
2020-12-01
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2023-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

In this study, we intend to enroll orthokeratology subjects aged 8-18 years old with binocular myopia up to and including -4.00 D. They were randomly selected to wear both orthokeratology of different designs, one with an aspheric wide inversion zone design in the optical zone and the other with a traditional spherical curved segment design, and to investigate the differences between these two lenses in terms of their effectiveness in myopia retardation, defocus, and aberration.

Interventions

DEVICEOrthokeratology with aspheric wide inversion zone design in the optical zone

An orthokeratology lens with an altered optical zone design is designed for an aspherical wide inversion arc in the optical zone

DEVICEOrthokeratology with traditional spherical design in the optical zone

Subjects wore the orthokeratology with traditional spherical design in the optical zone

Sponsors

Tianjin Eye Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The age is greater than 8 years and less than 18 years * The myopia was within -4.00D (including -4.00D), and the astigmatism was within 1.50D (including 1.50D) in both eyes. * Be able to complete 12 months of follow-up * They were able to understand the purpose of the trial, volunteered to participate, and signed informed consent by the subjects themselves or their legal guardians

Exclusion criteria

* One eye met the inclusion criteria * Patients with systemic diseases causing immunocompromised or affecting orthokeratology * There are other eye diseases that affect orthokeratology lens wearing, such as dacryocystitis, blepharitis, various inflammation, glaucoma, etc * Abnormal cornea * Previous corneal surgery or corneal trauma history * Active keratitis (e.g., corneal infection) * Patients with best corrected distance visual acuity of less than 5.0 * Patients with corneal flat curvature lower than 39.00D, or higher than 48.00D * Patients with refractive instability * Patients with overt strabismus * The corneal epithelium showed obvious fluorescent staining, which was not suitable for patients wearing orthokeratology lenses * Patients with dry eye are not suitable for orthokeratology * Patients with corneal endothelial cell density less than 2000 cells /mm2 * Patients who had worn rigid contact lenses (including orthokeratology lenses) within the previous 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in axial lengthThe change of baseline and 1yearsAxial length was measured with a biometer

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026