Skip to content

Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Improving Gait in the Patient With Multiple Sclerosis

Analysis of the Effectiveness of Dry Needling for Improving Gait in the Patient With Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized Single-blind Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05956119
Acronym
DRYNEEDEM
Enrollment
18
Registered
2023-07-21
Start date
2023-07-03
Completion date
2023-11-28
Last updated
2023-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune disease characterized by the appearance of lesions, characterized by heterogeneity in its pathological, clinical and radiological presentation. It has a significant socioeconomic impact, affecting interpersonal relationships and causing a significant reduction in quality of life. Patients with MS suffer from a series of symptoms (ocular, spasticity, cerebellar, sensory, fatigue, depression) that may be independent of the course of the disease and their management significantly influences quality of life and also requires multidisciplinary therapeutic measures. Physiotherapy and occupational therapy techniques are essential to reduce spasticity and prevent complications derived from it. Amongst physiotherapy techniques, we can find minimally invasive techniques such as dry needling which uses a fine filiform needle to penetrate the skin and mechanically break the myofascial trigger points, charactewrized by abnomral/pathological electrical activity. There have been previous studies with dry needling in stroke patients which have shown improvements in gait, but its effectiveness in other populations such as multiple sclerosis is still unclear. In addition, dry needling has proven to be a cost-effective treatment for spasticity in patients with chronic and subacute stroke and could be an alternative to other pharmacological treatments, although more studies are necessary to compare both the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness . Recent studies carried out in patients with multiple sclerosis suggest that dry needling can improve mobility and gait speed. The main objective of the study is to analyze the effect of the application of a single session of dry needling in the lower limbs on the gait of patients with multiple sclerosis. A prospective randomized parallel group clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment will be conducted. Participants will be recruited from the Hospital Universitario de Canarias.

Interventions

DEVICEdry needling + physiotherapy (standard/usual care)

same that arm descrption

OTHERsham dry needling + physiotherapy (standard/usual care)

same that arm description

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Having been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in a period of more than two years before the study starts 2. Participate voluntarily and sign the informed consent. 3. Suffering from some type of hypertonia or spasticity in MMII that makes walking difficult, measured with Expanded Disability Status Scale\>2 (Pyramidal section \>2) 4. Age from 18 to 60 years old. 5. Not having phobia of needles.

Exclusion criteria

1. Not signing the informed consent. 2. Having a phobia of needles. 3. Presenting an outbreak at the start of the study or having presented any outbreak up to two months before the start of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW)inmediatly before intervention, inmediatly after intervention, a week after the intervention and a month after the interventionis a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed 25-walk. This is considered the gold standard to assess gait speed in MS patients. The test measures the time in seconds that the patient needs to walk 25 feet (7.5 meters).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12)inmediatly before intervention, a week after the intervention and a month after the interventionis a self-report measure of the impact of MS on the individual´s walking ability. Each item is scored from 1 (no limitation) to 5 (extreme limitation), with a total score ranging from 12 to 60, where higher values show higher impairment . MSWS-12 scale shows properties which make it suitable for use in clinical practice, concretely for patients with medium-to-high levels of walking disability
Change in The Time up and go test (TUG)inmediatly before intervention, inmediatly after intervention, a week after the intervention and a month after the interventionwas designed initially to measure the probability for falls among older adults, but has been validated also for other populations such as MS. For this test, the participants sit in a chair with their backs supported by the back of the chair and their arms resting on the armrests. The participants are asked to get up from the chair and walk a distance of 3 me-ters, to turn on themselves (360°) and walk back to the chair and sit down again. The TUG test has demon-strated to be highly reliable and responsive in the assessment of respectively the walking capacity and general mobility of patients with MS with mild disability
Change in The Multiple Sclerosis International QoL (Musiqol-54)inmediatly before intervention and a month after the interventionThis is a specific quality of life questionnaire for MS. This is a self-assessment question-naire composed of 54 items, divided in a physical and mental domain. The range goes from 0 to 100, where 100 is the highest degree of quality of life. The Spanish version of the MSQoL 54 instrument has shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring qual-ity of life in patients with MS
Change in analog scale of quality of lifeinmediatly beforeintervention, a week after intervention and a month after interventionanalog scale of quality of life from 0 to 10

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026