Skip to content

Circulating Tumor DNA Study in Patients With Endometrial Cancer

Prospective Validation of the Association Between Circulating Tumor DNA Detection and Risk of Metastatic Relapse in Patients With Localized Endometrial Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05955079
Acronym
ctDNA-endo
Enrollment
130
Registered
2023-07-21
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2026-01-31
Last updated
2023-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

Endometrial Cancer, Digital-PCR, Circulating Tumor DNA, minimal residual disease, liquid biopsy

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to identify a population at risk of early recurrence after oncologic resection surgery of a primary uterine tumor based on the detection of ctDNA

Detailed description

Despite early management, the risk of recurrence in non-metastatic endometrial cancer (FIGO I-III) is approximately 10-20%. The challenge is to identify the most high-risk cases for relapse in order to adapt surgical and medical management. The development of digital PCR methods in nano-droplets, detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with high sensitivity, could help to better specify the prognosis of patients with localized endometrial cancer and to identify a population with residual disease, the source of this ctDNA. The investigators established a universal methylation signature in the laboratory based on analysis of endometrial cancer-specific DNA methylation using in silico analysis of public data from the Cancer Genome Atlas, validated in an independent cohort, with 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity. A prospective biological cohort was established between the gynecology and medical oncology departments and the Cochin Hospital biological resources center (CARPEM-OncoCentre collection). This is a prospective monocentric biological collection study. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of pre- and post-operative ctDNA detection in stage I-III endometrial cancer.

Interventions

3 samples (before, after surgery and before chemotherapy)

Sponsors

CARPEM, Institut du Cancer Paris
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centre de recherche des Cordeliers
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
METHYS DX
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients over 18 years of age who are potentially eligible for inclusion in the OncoCentre collection (registered as a patient at APHP, without legal protection measures, affiliated with a social security system) * Patients diagnosed with histologically documented endometrial cancer on an endometrial biopsy * Surgical intervention performed at Hopital Cochin

Exclusion criteria

* Failure to sign the OncoCentre consent form * Refusal of OncoCentre consent * Patient not eligible for upfront curative surgical treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence-free survival1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence-free survival3 years
Frequency of ctDNA detection based on established prognostic parameters3 yearsFrequency of ctDNA detection based on established prognostic parameters: histological type (endometrioid, non-endometrioid), grade (low grade, high grade), stage (localized to the uterus stages I-II or stage III with nodal involvement), lymphovascular invasion (present/absent), and molecular group (low risk: POLE, intermediate risk: MSI/NSMP, high risk: TP53).
Frequency of ctDNA detection in other prognostic groups3 yearsFrequency of ctDNA detection in other prognostic groups according to the 2021 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP classification
Frequency of ctDNA detection based on the recurrence profile3 yearsFrequency of ctDNA detection based on the recurrence profile : anatomical (locoregional versus distant; abdominal versus extra-abdominal; visceral or nodal) or dynamic (aggressive recurrence (progression-free survival post recurrence \<6 months) or non-aggressive (\>6 months))

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactGuillaume BEINSE, MD, PhD
guillaume.beinse@aphp.fr+33 1 58 41 14 54
Backup ContactLaetitia PEAUDECERF
laetitia.peaudecerf@aphp.fr+33 1 58 41 12 13

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026