Skip to content

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education on Clinical and Psychosocial Variables in Chronic Low Back Pain

Effectiveness of Group Versus Individual Pain Neuroscience Education on Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05953454
Enrollment
69
Registered
2023-07-20
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2024-12-30
Last updated
2023-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low-back Pain

Keywords

pain neuroscience education, physical therapy, chronic pain

Brief summary

An educational intervention on the neurophysiology of chronic pain will be provided. The content of the intervention will be identical in the experimental groups (group and individual). The intervention has an active educational approach based on reconceptualizing the maladaptive beliefs that influence the fear-avoidance behavior of the participants through updated contents of the neuroscience of pain. The effects of the intervention will be compared between the groups and the influence of the social determinants of health on the effects will also be determined. The investigators hypothesize that there will be significant differences in favor of the group intervention group over the individual intervention groups. Furthermore, the effects will be influenced by the social determinants of health in both experimental groups.

Interventions

OTHERPain neuroscience Education

A pain neuroscience education session geared towards fear-avoidance beliefs

Sponsors

Universidad Santo Tomas, Chile
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* non-specific low back pain ≥ 3 months without compromise of any lower limb. * average pain intensity ≥ 3/10 and ≤8/10 (according to the 0-10 numerical rating scale \[NRS\]) in the last month.

Exclusion criteria

* psychiatric, neurological or oncological diseases. * operated of some lumbar pathology * chronic low back pain due to a specific cause (lumbar stenosis, herniated disc, spinal deformity, fracture, spondylosis) * have received any modality of active or passive physical therapy for pain in the last two months, * previous experiences with PNE

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Fear avoidance beliefsbaseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 4 -weeks post-interventionThe Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire consists of two subscales: (1) a 7-item work subscale (FABQ-W) and (2) a 4-item physical activity subscale (FABQ-P). Both subscales score on a Likert-type scale from 0 to 6 points on each item. Higher scores indicate higher levels of fear-avoidance beliefs.
changes in pressure pain sensitivitybaseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 4 -weeks post-interventionAn algometer will be used to measure pressure pain sensitivity (SPD), which is defined as the amount of applied pressure required for a subject to report the onset of pain sensation. It will be applied three times for each moment of evaluation and the average of the three applications will be considered. The unit of measure kg/cm2/s will be used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Catastrophizingbaseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 4 -weeks post-interventionPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) consists of 13 items on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (0) never to (4) all the time. Higher scores indicate more catastrophic thoughts.
Changes in Pain Self-efficacybaseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 4 -weeks post-interventionCain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) consists of 10 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all sure) to 6 (very sure). Higher scores indicate stronger self-efficacy beliefs, while low scores indicate a subject more focused on their pain.
Changes in Pain intensitybaseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 4 -weeks post-interventionNumerical Rating Scale (NRS). It consists of a number line from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater intensity of pain.
Treatment expectationbaselineThe treatment expectation questionnaire (TEX-Q). This questionnaire consists of 15 questions with a Likert scale of 0-10. higher scores indicate a better expectation of treatment.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Educational levelbaselineparticipants were assigned to the lower educational level if they had not completed secondary education and to the higher educational level if they had completed secondary education or university studies
Employment statusbaselineemployed versus unemployed
economic incomebaselineindividual monthly taxable income

Contacts

Primary ContactJoaquín I Salazar, MSc
jsalazar13@santotomas.cl+569 73785287

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026