Skip to content

HAP/VAP Diagnosis in Critically Ill Septic Patients Using a Multiplex PCR Array

HAP/VAP Diagnosis in Critically Ill Septic Patients Using a Multiplex PCR Assay: A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial. THE LIGHTNING STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05952648
Acronym
LIGHTNING
Enrollment
126
Registered
2023-07-19
Start date
2024-04-03
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HAP - Hospital Acquired Pneumonia, VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Brief summary

Multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial to assess if semiquantitative multiplex PCR assay, as compared to conventional microbiology, can reduce the percentage of patients without microbiological diagnosis in the first 24 hours from HAP/VAP suspicion, thus allowing early de-escalation.

Detailed description

Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia are leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Intensive Care Unit due to the underlining clinical conditions of critically ill patients and the high rate of multidrug resistance among causative agents. In patients with sepsis and septic shock, early and appropriate antibiotics are essential for improving clinical outcome, often requiring the use of broad-spectrum combinations. The optimal use of antimicrobials is part of current implementation programs aimed to reduce the administration of not-necessary antibiotics, the bio-ecologic pressure and the possible side effects . In this context the application of rapid, molecular microbiological tests on respiratory samples is of overwhelming interest, due to the potential of reducing the time to inappropriate antibiotic therapy and of prompting de-escalation. During last years a new Multiplex PCR Assay for pneumonia diagnosis (Film-Array Pneumonia Panel Plus, BioFire, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) has been implementing in the clinical practice, showing very high rates of negative and positive predictive values. The hypothesis is that molecular test on lower respiratory tract samples may reduce the time to microbiological diagnosis, thus allowing early antibiotic de-escalation.

Interventions

PROCEDURELower tract respiratory samples

Within 1 hour from HAP or VAP suspicion, quantitative tracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage will be performed to confirm the diagnosis. Clinicians will be encouraged to perform BAL whenever possible

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMultiplex PCR assay (Film-array Pneumonia Panel Plus)

The lower tract respiratory samples will be analyzed with Multiplex PCR assay (Film-array Pneumonia Plus).

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLower respiratory tract standard culture

The lower tract respiratory samples will be analyzed using convention microbiological methods (including conventional Gram stain and semiquantitative culture on both selective/differential and screening agar media)

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBlood sample standard culture

When HAP or VAP are suspected, blood samples from peripheral vein will be collected and analyzed with conventional microbiological methods

Sponsors

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Lead SponsorOTHER
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled, multicenter, open-label trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Suspicion of HAP/VAP (clinical/radiological/laboratory criteria); * Availability to perform tracheal aspirates or broncoalveolar lavage within 1 hour from clinical suspicion * Life expectancy ≥ 48 hours * Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy, * Concomitant participating in other interventional trial * Refusal to sign informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients without microbiological diagnosis of HAP/VAP within the first 24 hours24 hoursProportion of patients where a microbiological diagnosis of HAP/VAP is not avaiable within the first 24 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of antibiotic de-escalation as a consequence of microbiological results4 daysProportion of patients in which antibiotic therapy has been modified from broad-spectrum empirical to targeted, due to microbiological results
Time to antibiotic de-escalation and optimal therapy4 daysPeriod of time from empirical antibiotic therapy initiation to modification due to microbiological results
Mechanical Ventilation free-days14 and 28 daysNumber of days from enrollment in which the patients is not mechanically ventilated
Rate of MDR infection28 daysProportion of patients who suffered from infection caused by multidrug resistant germ
Lenght of intensive care unit stay60 daysPeriod of time from enrollment in which the patient is admitted to the intensive care unit
Lenght of hospital stay60 daysPeriod of time from enrollment in which the patient is admitted to the hospital
In-Intensive care unit mortality28 days and 60 daysAll-cause mortality, assessed during ICU stay
28 days and 60 days mortality28 days and 60 daysAll-cause mortality
SOFA score14 daysMeasured SOFA score after 2,3,7 and 14 days from enrollment
Diagnostic concordance4 daysProportion of patients in the interventional group, in which microbiological diagnosis is concordant when assessed with PCR array and standard culture
Adverse event28 daysProportion of patients in which any adverse event is registered
In-Hospital mortality28 days and 60 daysAll-cause mortality, assessed during Hospital stay

Countries

Italy

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGennaro De Pascale, MD

Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

STUDY_CHAIRMassimo Antonelli, MD

Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 3, 2026