Skip to content

Esketamine and Propofol for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder Undergoing Colonoscopy

Determination of the Median Effective Dose of Propofol in Combination With Different Doses of Esketamine During Colonoscopy for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05951465
Enrollment
46
Registered
2023-07-19
Start date
2023-07-20
Completion date
2023-09-20
Last updated
2023-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

colonoscopy, anaesthesia, autism spectrum disorder, propofol, esketamine

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the dose-response relationship of esketamine in combination with propofol for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder undering colonoscopy.

Detailed description

Autistic children appear with significant frequency for medical services, lots of which requiring procedural sedation or anaesthesia. They have often been described as difficult to sedate or anesthetize due to a variety of ASD symptoms. It is a challenging task to provide safe and effective sedation during the colonoscopic procedure in autism children. Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures is safe and acceptable for children, especially those who express significant anxiety. Propofol-based sedation turned out to be the most effective dosage regimens, with effectiveness comparable to general anesthesia. The addition of certain dose ketamine to propofol may increase the effectiveness without creating more adverse events.

Interventions

DRUGEsketamine

esketamine dose will be 0.3 mg/kg. Propofol dose for the first patient will be 2.5 mg/kg. Doses for the subsequent patients will increase or decrease by 0.8 mg/kg using the Dixon Up and Down method.

DRUGPropofol

propofol

Sponsors

Nanjing Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* (1) aged 2-12 years; * (2) diagnosed with ASD by pediatric psychiatrists in accordance with the criteria in the Fifth Edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V); * (3) evaluated as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II; * (4) scheduled for colonic procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* (1) oral sedation (premedication) before intravenous catheter placement; * (2) any contraindication to study medications; * (3) other circumstances in which the investigator determined that a patient was not suitable for participation in the clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of colonoscpopy 1Procedure (This outcome is measured at the time of insertion of colonoscopy)The objective is to determine the effective bolus dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of propofol in combination with ketamine 0.3, 0.6mg/kg that produces an adequate depth of anesthesia to prevent minimal or no movement on colonoscopy insertion in children with Autism spectrum disorder.
Dose of Propofol Required to Prevent Movement (Response) to Insertion of colonoscpopy 2Procedure (This outcome is measured at the time of insertion of colonoscopy)The objective is to determine the effective bolus dose in 95% of subjects (ED50) of propofol in combination with ketamine 0.3, 0.6mg/kg that produces an adequate depth of anesthesia to prevent minimal or no movement on colonoscopy insertion in children with Autism spectrum disorder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
movement score during the procedureduring the procudure(1 = no movement; 2 = semipurposeful allowing continuation of the procedure; 3 = vigorous purposeful movements withholding the procedure)
arterial blood pressureduring the procudurearterial blood pressure was measured noninvasively at four time points:T0: before induction of sedation,T1: immediately after induction of sedation, T2: complete evaluation of the coln through colonoscopy, T3: at the end of colonic TET procedure。
adverse eventduring the procedure - 24 hours after procedure(including hypoxia (SpO2 \<93% for \>10 s) or respiratory depression (apnea \>15 s), hypotension (MAP \< 20% from baseline) or bradycardia (HR \< 60 x/min and/or decrease in HR \> 20% from baseline) were recorded.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026