Skip to content

Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Versus Phonophoresis in Sub Acromial Impingement Syndrome.

The Influence of Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Versus Phonophoresis on Pain Severity and Functional Disability in Patients With Sub Acromial Impingement Syndrome. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05951322
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-07-19
Start date
2023-01-08
Completion date
2023-06-08
Last updated
2023-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sub Acromial Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

Extra corporeal shock wave, phonophoresis, sub acromial impingement syndrome

Brief summary

shoulder sub acromial impingement syndrome is an encroachment of subacrormial tissues, rotator cuff, subacrormial bursa, and the long head of the biceps tendon, as a result of narrowing of the subacrormial space. Activities requiring repetitive or sustained use of the arms over head often predispose the rotator cuff tendon to injury. Hence the objective of the study is to examine the influence of extra corporeal Shock wave versus phonophoresis on pain severity and functional disability in patients with sub acromial impingement syndrome.

Detailed description

Background: shoulder sub acromial impingement syndrome is an encroachment of subacrormial tissues, rotator cuff, subacrormial bursa, and the long head of the biceps tendon, as a result of narrowing of the subacrormial space. Activities requiring repetitive or sustained use of the arms over head often predispose the rotator cuff tendon to injury. Objective of the study: To examine the influence of extra corporeal Shock wave versus phonophoresis on pain severity and functional disability in patients with sub acromial impingement syndrome. Subjects and Methods: Thirty patients diagnosed as shoulder impingement syndrome stage II Neer classification due to mechanical causes. Patients were randomly distributed into two equal groups. The first group consisted of 15 patients with a mean age of 45.46 (+ 8.64) received therapeutic exercises( stretching exercise of posterior shoulder capsule and strengthening exercises of shoulder muscles) and shockwave therapy (6000 shock, 2000/session, 3 sessions, 2 weeks a part, 0.22mJ/mm2) years. The second group consisted of 15 patients with a mean age of 46.26 (+ 8.05) received same therapeutic exercises and phonophoresis (3 times per week, each other day, for 4 consecutive weeks). Patients were evaluated pretreatment and post treatment for shoulder pain severity, shoulder functional disability, shoulder flexion, abduction and internal rotation motions.

Interventions

DEVICEShockwave therapy

Radial extracorporeal shock wave device, it is serial number (1107394), medispec and connected to electrical supply 115/220 A C frequency.

Pagani ultrasound apparatus 200 cosistts of multi frequency head(1 and 3 MHz), surface area 4 cm², continuous and pulsed mode, main voltages: 100-240-VAC.50/60Hz.

Sponsors

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome asseser is blinded.

Intervention model description

Participants were identified and recruited over 5-month period. Thirty-six patients diagnosed clinically with shoulder impingement syndrome (according to location of trigger points at rotator cuff muscles and aggravation of pain with overhead activities) were randomly assigned in two groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient reported a positive Neer sign and Hawkins sign. * The patient reported pain with active shoulder elevation in the scapular plane (eg: welders, plate workers, slaughterhouse workers and over head playing athletes). * The patient reported pain with palpation of the rotator cuff tendons. * The patient reported pain with resisted isometric abduction.

Exclusion criteria

* Frozen shoulder. * Rotator cuff tear. * Glenohumeral or acromioclavicular arthritis. * Implented pace maker. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityBaselinePain assessed by (Visual analog scale (VAS). VAS is a scale that allows continuous data analysis and uses a 10cm line with 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain) on the other end .Patients were asked to place a mark a long the line to denote their level of pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional disabilityBaselineIt was assessed by using the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) which is a valid and reliable index for measuring shoulder pain and disability. It consists of two parts, part one which assesses pain and part two which assesses functional disability. Scores were calculated as follow, in part one pain scores in all questions were added, and the mean value was chosen. In part two functional score of all questions were added and the mean value was chosen for the purpose of data analysis. Final score for each part was statistically analyzed separately.
Range of motionBaselineIn this study the shoulder flexion, abduction and internal rotation were measured by using(Model 01129 Guymon goniometer). It is an electrogoniometer which eliminates the need of manually score each measurement by storing the information internally, it reduces time. It measure any joint angle quickly and accurately. It has range of 0 to 360 and stores up to 80 data points. The validity and reliability of electrogoniometer for shoulder assessment was tested and well documented.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026