Malocclusion, Angle Class II
Conditions
Brief summary
Patients with skeletal class II malocclusion who have a retracted lower jaw will be treated in this study. The efficacy of clear Plates in the treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion will be assessed. The skeletal, dental and soft tissues changes resulted by this intervention will be studied and compared with the results of Traditional treatment with fixed appliances.
Detailed description
There are two group: 1. a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates. 2. a group of patients in which participants will be undergo to the traditional Twin-Block Appliance. phase Intervention/treatment Condition or disease Not applicable Other: Modified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates. Other: Traditional Twin-Block Appliance. Skeletal class II Malocclusion
Interventions
DEVICEModified Twin-Block Appliance with Clear Plates.
Clear plates technique A group of patients in which participants will be undergo to clear plates treatment will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily
DEVICETraditional Twin-Block appliance
Traditional Twin-Block appliance A group of patients in which participants will undergo to the Traditional Twin-Block appliance Treatment, appliances will be applied to the upper and lower arch 17 hours daily
Sponsors
Hama University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* \- Patients with mixed dentition at age 10.5-13 years. * The patient has Skeletal class II malocclusion caused by mandibular retraction ANB \> 5, 8 mm \>O.J\> 5 mm, SNB\<78, angle (NSAr) ≥ ° 125 and normal placement of the upper jaw. * The patient is willing to accept treatment with a removable device. * No previous orthodontic treatment * the growth model is within the normal or horizontal maxillary opening angle of 30 \>MM or angle of 400 \> Björk * patients do not have an upper alveolar dental protrusion.
Exclusion criteria
* -Patients with periodontal disease. * patients with a neuromuscular disorder. * patients of class I or III of malocclusion. * Patients with temporomandibular joint disorder. * Patients with Skeletal open bite. * Patients with poor oral and gingival health * the presence of a unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite. * patients who have upper jaw stenosis and need to be prepared by expansion before functional treatment. * any patient who does not meet one or more of the Inclusion criteria will be removed from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the SNA angle[ | : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) | This angle the represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. |
| change in the SNB angle [ | : T0:1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) | This angle the represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. |
| change in the mandibular length | T0: 1day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) | Amount of distance measured from the Co point to Gn point in the cephalometric analysis. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this angle is going to be measured in degrees. |
| change in overjet | T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) | Represents The distance between the most anterior point on the lower incisor to the most anterior point on the upper incisor in the cephalometric analysis. |
| change in the vertical position of incisors | : T0: 1 day before the beginning of treatment . T1: when a normal overjet and canines class I relationships achieved (expected to be within 6-9 months in the exp. Group and control group) | The vertical distance from the edge of the lower incisor to the mandibular plane. |
Countries
Syria
Contacts
CONTACTFadi Jnaid
STUDY_DIRECTORRabab Alsabbagh,, DDS MSc PhD
Professor of Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama, Syria.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORANAS FAKHOURI
Student in Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama.
Outcome results
None listed