Skip to content

Comparison Between Abduction External Rotation Brace and Arm Sling After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff

Comparison Between Abduction External Rotation Brace and Arm Sling After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05948995
Acronym
ARCR
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-07-17
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2025-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Brief summary

Comparison between Abduction External Rotation Brace and Arm Sling after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff : A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of primary outcome : range of motion (at pre-operative , post-operative) , pain score , shoulder functional score

Detailed description

Comparison between Abduction External Rotation Brace and Arm Sling after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff : A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of primary outcome : range of motion (at pre-operative , post-operative) , pain score , shoulder functional score There are gaps of knowledge which sling/brace are the best for post operative arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Because patient who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have to wear these sling/brace for at least 1 month after operation , the better one could reduce post-operative shoulder stiffness , decrease pain and improve functional shoulder score

Interventions

DEVICEAbduction external rotation brace

Abduction external rotation brace Arm position : Abduction , External rotation

Sponsors

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

On the follow up date , both groups will be removed sling / brace before receiving by outcome assessor

Intervention model description

The participants were randomly divided into two groups. The control group received arm sling post operative arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The experimental group received abduction external rotation brace post operative arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with full thickness rotator cuff tear * Plan for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Exclusion criteria

* Revision cuff surgery * Unable to answer question * Previous shoulder surgery * Full thickness subscapularis tear

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of range of motion of shoulders from baselineAt postoperative 3 weeksMeasurement by Goniometer into degrees (forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation)
Change of range of motion of shoulder from baselineAt postoperative 1 yearMeasurement by Goniometer into degrees (forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of visual analog scale for pain from baselineChange from visual analog scale after 6 weeks postoperativeRange from 1-10 (1 = minimum pain, 10 = maximum pain)
Change of constant Murley's score from baselineChange from visual analog scale after 6 weeks postoperativeScore 0-100 (Functional shoulder score), 0 = worst, 100 = best
Change of the Thai version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index from baselineChange from visual analog scale after 6 weeks postoperativeThai functional shoulder score 0 = worst, 100 = best

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026