Skip to content

Mirror Therapy Versus PNF on LE Function in Stroke

Comparison of Mirror Therapy and PNF on Lower Extremity Function in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05948384
Enrollment
36
Registered
2023-07-17
Start date
2023-07-24
Completion date
2024-01-19
Last updated
2024-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Many rehabilitation strategies are being implemented to treat stroke. Constraint-induced movement therapy and robotics are two potentially useful treatment options for rehabilitation. Range of motion exercises, PNF, mirror therapy is also used. Fitness training, high-intensity treatment, and repetitive-task training are all promising strategies that might help improve elements of gait. Repeated task training may also help with transfer functions

Detailed description

PNF and mirror therapy has its effect on chronic stroke patients. Both mirror therapy and PNF work on the concept of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity is the ability of the nervous system to change its activity in response to intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli by reorganizing its structure, functions, or connections after injuries. Because of brain plasticity, neurorehabilitation has evolved, as evidenced by numerous physiotherapeutic approaches such as proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and mirror treatment (MT). The reorganization also includes the expansion of cortical regions, which offer the neural foundation for the recovery or adaption of motor activity following injury. As the literature supports the individual effects of both techniques in stroke population but as per author's access, there is no literature provide the comparison among both techniques i.e. PNF and mirror therapy in lower limb for chronic stroke patients on gait and functionality. Hence the author established the research question that is there any difference among these techniques in stroke population in terms of its effects and efficiency on gait and functionality. The study will provide an insight to the clinician about which technique has the superior/ better effects for the lower extremity functions in chronic stroke patients thus telling the effects two neurorehabilitation methods i.e. proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and mirror therapy (MT).

Interventions

OTHERPNF

For the PNF intervention, we applied a lower extremity hip extension-abduction-internal rotation with knee extension pattern, together with the rhythmic initiation of a repeated stretch and a combination of isotonic techniques. By this we'll target rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, biceps femoris and semitendinosus musculature of the patient. The session will be given in 2 sets of 5 repetitions with rest of 45 seconds

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both male and female * ACA stroke * Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke * MMSE grade \>24 * Spasticity at modified Ashworth scale between 1 and 2 * Modified Rankin scale 4

Exclusion criteria

* Any orthopedic impairment of lower extremity like LLD, fractures, dislocations, amputations, deformity of joint * Any other neurological condition (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, SCI)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lower extremity functional scale8 weeka reliable patient-rated outcome measure for assessing lower extremity function. This is a 20-item self-report questionnaire. The highest attainable score is 80 points, signifying excellent function. The lowest possible score is 0, indicating very poor function. It has an outstanding internal reliability (=0.96) and a valid tool. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dynamic gait index8 weekIt assesses the participant's ability to maintain walking balance while reacting to varied task demands under diverse dynamic settings. It is a beneficial test for those who have vestibular and balance issues, as well as those who are at danger of falling. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week
Time Up and Go Test8 weekTime up and go test is a quick and widely used clinical performance-based measure of lower extremity function, mobility and fall risk with a specificity of 0.70 and sensitivity of 0.57 and reliability of 0.98.The higher the score reflects the worst functional status. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale8 weekIt is a patient-centered outcome measure designed to assess health-related quality of life in stroke patients. Patients must answer each question with a reference to the previous week. It is a self-report measure with 49 items divided into 12 areas. A 5-point Likert scale is used to rate the items. The Cronbach alpha ranged from 0.75-0.89. It will be measured at baseline, 4th and 8th week

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026