Autism Spectrum Disorder, Brain Neoplasms, Brain Pathology, Growth Retardation, Premedication
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study was to assess the anxiolytic and sedative effect of OZALIN® / OZASED® (ADV6209) 0,25mg/Kg in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under inhalational anesthesia. Our hypothesis is that compared to children who do not receive any premedication, palatability of OZALIN® / OZASED® by allowing an easier acceptance of the drug, improves the quality of anesthesia induction and postoperative behavioral outcome improving sedation and reducing the need for inhalation anesthetic which has been recognized as the main cause of post-procedural behavioral changes, including emergence agitation.
Detailed description
Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the primary investigative tool for evaluating a wide range of paediatric medical conditions. Sedatives are often needed in this population to ensure immobilization during the acquisition of the images. Midazolam has always been the most used anxiolytic-sedative drug in the pediatric population. Over time, the intravenous formulation of midazolam has been used also for oral, nasal or rectal administration but those alternative routes of administration represent an off-label use. Recently, in Europe was licensed ADV6209, a midazolam solution for oral use containing gamma-cyclodextrin (OZALIN® / OZASED®). The aim of this study was to assess its anxiolytic and sedative effect at a dosage of 0,25mg/Kg in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under inhalational anesthesia. Our hypothesis is that compared to children who do not receive any premedication, palatability of OZALIN® / OZASED® by allowing an easier acceptance of the drug, improves the quality of anesthesia induction and postoperative behavioral outcome improving sedation and reducing the need for inhalation anesthetic which has been recognized as the main cause of post-procedural behavioral changes, including emergence agitation.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
\- We included in the study 100 children (either gender), aged 1-10 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 3 who, between March and December 2022, received inhalation anesthesia for brain and spinal cord MRI for diagnostic investigations or postoperative and oncological follow-up
Exclusion criteria
* 1\) a history of hypersensitivity to midazolam; 2) chronic therapy with benzodiazepines; 3) acute respiratory tract infections; 4) psychiatric and behavioural disorders; 5) ASA physical status \>3.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| evaluation of patients' reactive behavior to facemask positioning for inhalational anesthesia induction. | 30 minutes within premedication administration | evaluation of patients' reactive behavior to facemask positioning for inhalational anesthesia induction evaluated on a four-point scale (Mask Acceptance Scale, MAS) indicating that child is cooperative and accept the mask readily (MAS=1), he is slight fearful and accepts the mask with mild resistance (MAS=2), with moderate struggle (MAS=3) or he resists strongly and must be restrained (MAS=4) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| time to eye closure at induction of anesthesia; | procedure (at induction of general anesthesia) | time to eye closure at induction of anesthesia |
| patient degree of acceptance of the administered premedication | 30 minutes before induction of general anesthesia | degree of acceptance of the administered premedication |
| evaluation of OZALIN® / OZASED® anxiolytic efficacy | 30 minutes after premedication administration | OZALIN® / OZASED® anxiolytic efficacy was evaluated 30 minutes after premedication administration with the Ramsay sedation scale |
| the percentage of sevoflurane at which the child's eyes closed upon induction of general anesthesia | procedure (at induction of general anesthesia) | the percentage of sevoflurane at which the child's eyes closed upon induction of general anesthesia; |
| occurrence of delirium at the emergence from anesthesia | at emergence of anesthesia procedure | The occurrence of emergence delirium at the end of the procedure was measured using the five items of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale (PAED) |
| evaluation of behavioural changes seven days after the procedure, between the two groups. | 7 days after the magnetic resonance Imaging | Maladaptive behavioural responses and developmental regression seven days after the procedure were evaluated by parents of children with the Post Hospitalization Behaviour Questionnaire for Ambulatory Surgery (PHBS-AS). |
| child's behavior on separation from the parent | baseline (before induction of general anesthesia) | Child's behavior at the moment of separation from the parent just before induction of anesthesia was evaluated with a four-point Parental Separation Anxiety scale (PSAS) |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed