Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Surgery
Conditions
Keywords
Stereotactic body radiation therapy, daily-adaptive radiation therapy, prostate cancer, recurrent prostate cancer
Brief summary
There is significant, proven use of radiation for recurrent prostate cancer after surgical resection. This treatment typically is delivered over seven and a half weeks of daily treatments, presenting a burden to patients and the health care system. Stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) is a radiation technique in which large doses are delivered over a short period of time. To date there is extremely limited evidence in SBRT for recurrent prostate cancer after surgery, with a significantly growing body of evidence for primary SBRT treatment of prostate cancer in men who opt for non-surgical upfront treatment. Additionally, advances in imaging have allowed better detection of the site of recurrence, and novel artificial intelligence aided daily-adaptive radiation therapy have allowed more precise delivery of radiation doses. This study seeks to evaluate the role of Daily-Adaptive with AI-assisted SBRT in the post operative setting utilizing Ethos Plan Adaptive technology in attempt to maintain control and minimize side effects.
Detailed description
This will be a two cohort Phase II single center, prospective trial, with a safety lead-in component. This design will allow an initial toxicity assessment phase of a novel radiation treatment schema that is based on other literature, but with limited evidence. There is no plan to escalate the dose. Pending assessment of the safety lead in, complete enrollment will be permitted. Each cohort will be analyzed separated for the safety lead in. There will be 7 patients in the safety lead in cohorts. The stopping point will be an incidence of 2 cases of CTCAE v5.0 Grade 3+ acute toxicity attributed to therapy within gastrointestinal or urinary domains. This generally entails symptoms significant enough to require a procedure or limit basic levels of daily activity (bathing, cooking). Actue toxicity of a comparable magnitude has been reported in the 1-5% rate in a recent meta-analysis of contemporary trials which utilized standard of care radiation. Thus two cases would represent an unacceptable increased toxicity level, and a cohort size of 7 is approximate the commonly accepted size in Phase I escalation studies to evaluate dose limiting toxicity.
Interventions
Daily-adaptive radiation therapy to two dose levels - one to the area of radiologic recurrent nodal disease, and a lower, prophylactic dose to the standard post-prostatectomy and larger pelvic node fields
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
This will be a two cohort Phase II single center, prospective trial, with a safety lead-in component. The cohorts will be defined by location of recurrence - either prostate bed alone, or a pelvic node with or without a prostate bed recurrence. This design will allow an initial toxicity assessment phase of a novel radiation treatment schema that is based on other literature, but with limited evidence. There is no plan to escalate the dose. Pending assessment of the safety lead in, complete enrollment will be permitted. Each cohort will be analyzed separated for the safety lead in.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with previous surgical resection * Radiologically detected prostate bed OR regional nodal recurrence defined as iliac, obturator, perirectal or pre-sacral node generally encompassing below the aortic bifurcation * Prostate bed recurrence as occurring within the region of the prostate or RTOG consensus definition of the surgical field * At least two serum detectable PSA levels defined as \>0.02 ng/dl at least 30 days apart.
Exclusion criteria
* Metastatic disease * Prior radiation therapy to the pelvis region * Inflammatory bowel disease * Hospitalization for a gastrointestinal diagnosis in the preceeding 3 months * Hospitalization for a urinary tract issue / diagnosis in the preceeding 3 months * PSA \>10 ng/dl at study entry,
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]) | 1-2 years | The Primary objective of the safety lead in component is to report acute, attributable genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity as scored by CTCAE v5.0. |
| The primary objective of the full enrollment Phase II component is to report biochemical recurrence free survival (bPFS). | 5 years | We will utilize a globally standard definition of bPFS which was defined in the RADICALS(6) international trial as follows: freedom from PSA of 0·4 ng/mL or greater following postoperative radiotherapy, or PSA of more than 2·0 ng/mL at any time following therapy, clinical progression, or initiation of non-protocol hormone therapy, or death from any cause. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Long term side effects | 5 years | Late patient toxicity as defined by EPIC-IPSS prostate QoL forms |
| Distant metastasis free survival | 5 years | Development of metastatic prostate cancer to other parts of the body |
| Need for long term anti-testosterone therapy | 5 years | Time to initiation of non-protocol hormonal therapy, if needed |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Planning parameters and techniques | 5 years | Identification of novel artificial-intelligence aided planning techniques, algorithms, and utilization as uncovered during the course of therapy |
Countries
United States