Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
Conditions
Brief summary
Objective: To compare the effects of incentive spirometer as a visual feedback versus deep breathing via mirror mediated therapy on pulmonary function in children with spastic cerebral palsy. To determine the effects of incentive spirometer as a visual feedback versus deep breathing via mirror mediated therapy on sleep and quality of life in children with spastic cerebral palsy.
Interventions
OTHERIncentive spirometer as visual feedback
Incentive spirometer as deep breathing then UE movement in sitting: Frequency: 2 sets of 10x Intensity: Up to tolerance (hold breath for 2-4 secs). Time: Twice a week Type: Deep breathing exercise UE movement: Gentle ROMs (5 reps) along with conventional Treatment; Passive stretching of spastic muscles, Strengthening of weak muscles using manual resistance, Diaphragmatic Breathing, Resisted Diaphragmatic Breathing (placing 5Ib sandbag on abdomen).
OTHERDiaphragmatic breathing exercise (Mirror mediated therapy)
Diaphragmatic breathing exercise (Mirror mediated therapy): In front of mirror deep breathing with UE movement in sitting: Frequency: 1 cycle of 10x Intensity: Up to tolerance. Time: 3 times per week. Type: Deep breathing exercise. UE movement: Gentle ROMs (5 reps). along with conventional Treatment; Passive stretching of spastic muscles, Strengthening of weak muscles using manual resistance, Diaphragmatic Breathing, Resisted Diaphragmatic Breathing (placing 5Ib sandbag on abdomen).
Sponsors
Riphah International University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Participants falling in this category would be recruited into the study. * Spastic diplegic, age above 5. * According to modified Ashworth scale, moderate spasticity 1 to 3. * Adequate cognition (will be assessed by using MMSE scale) in order to follow the instructions to use Incentive Spirometry and also able to comprehend single verbal command for breathing. * Able to attend all sessions. (mentally and physically capable of attending session). * Able to sit with support.
Exclusion criteria
* Participant falling in this category would be excluded of the study. * Patients with any respiratory or cardiac disease that can affect their respiratory function. * Patients with beta blockers or bronchodilators. * Children with any cognitive impairment who are unable to follow instructions. * Children with bone deformities, such as scoliosis or kyphosis. * Children with any sort of auditory and visual defects.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | 6 weeks | Changes from the Baseline, the digital spirometer is used in clinical setting to analyze peak expiratory flow PEF in Liter/second |
| Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) | 6 weeks | Changes from the Baseline, the digital spirometer is used in clinical setting to analyze Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second FEV1 in Liters |
| Forced vital Capacity (FVC) | 6 weeks | Changes From the Baseline, the digital spirometer is used in clinical setting to analyze Forced vital Capacity in Liters |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life questionnaire for children (CPQOL-Child) | 6 weeks | Changes from the baseline, This questionnaire has been specifically developed for children with cerebral palsy to measure the quality of life. Primary care giver questionnaire (4-12 years). These items can be recorded by the following formula: 1-2 (Very unhappy), 3-4(Unhappy), 5(neither happy nor unhappy), 6- 7(happy), 8-9 (very happy). If person scored 1, record to 0 If person scored 2, record to 12.5 If person scored 3, record to 25 If person scored 4, record to 37.5 If person scored 5, record to 50 If person scored 6, record to 62.5 If person scored 7, record to 75 If person scored 8, record to 87.5 If person scored 9, record to 100 |
| Sleep (Sleep Disturbance Scale-SDSC) | 6 weeks | This scale has been validated for children aged 6 to 15 years. The questionnaire is completed by caregiver or parents. It has internal consistency 0.71 to 0.79, test-retest reliability of 0.71 and diagnostic accuracy of 0.91. (32, 33) Scoring It is liker-type scale that indicates the following: 1 means 'never' 5 means 'always' Total score (sum 6 factors' scores) Higher the score indicates more acute sleep disturbances. To obtain results, scores are tallied for each of six sleep disordere |
Countries
Pakistan
Outcome results
None listed