Stress Urinary Incontinence
Conditions
Keywords
Visceral fat, total body fat, obese female, stress urinary incontinence
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the visceral fat reduction versus total body fat reduction on stress urinary incontinence in obese females.
Detailed description
compare the effect of visceral fat reduction versus total body fat reduction on stress urinary incontinence in obese females. control group: consist of 20 obese women. They will receive Kegel exercises only 3 session/ week for 12 weeks. Diet group: consist of 20 obese women. They will receive low caloric diet and Kegel exercises 3 session/week for 12 weeks. Ultrasound cavitation group: consist of 20 obese women. They will receive Kegel exercises 3 session/week and ultrasound cavitation two sessions per week.
Interventions
* low caloric diet (800-1200) calories/day,). According to each patient, diet contained (carbohydrate protein, fats, minerals, vitamins). 50 to 55% of total calories are carbohydrates, 10 to 15% of total calories protein. Fat limited to less than about 28% of daily total calories .Women took 1200 calories in the first month, 1000 calories in the second month, and 800 calories in the third month. Every week, each woman allowed to change the types of food to avoid boarding. * ultrasound cavitation emits low-frequency ultrasound 40 khz for 30 minutes on abdomen twice/ week with 3 days apart for 12 weeks. kegel exercise: Each woman in the study took the same Kegel exercise program performed the Kegel exercise for 12 weeks (3 sessions per week)
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Double (participant,outcomes Assessor) Random generator
Intervention model description
Visceral fat reduction vs total body fat reduction on obese female with stress urinary incontinence
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* They will be diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence grade≥ 1 * Their age will range from 35-48 years old. * Their body mass index will exceed 29.9 kg/m². * Their hip waist ratio will be more than 0.85 cm. * They will be multipara \>1.
Exclusion criteria
* · Fecal incontinence, urge incontinence, overflow incontinence or functional incontinence or prolapse. * Diabetes, asthma, cardiovascular, or renal diseases * Taking medication for stress urinary incontinence or hormonal replacement therapy. * Gynecological surgeries, or surgeries for obesity. * Pregnant women.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| stress urinary incontinence | 12 weeks | evaluate stress urinary incontinence by The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire ranged from (0-21) Question items: Frequency or urinary incontinence Amount of leakage Overall impact of urinary incontinence Self-diagnostic item. The ICIQ-UI Short form provides a score ranging from 0-21. With a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms. The self-diagnostic portion of the questionnaire is not given a score |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| waist circumference | 12 weeks | measure waist circumference in centimeter |
| Measure weight | 12 weeks | Measure weight in kilogram |
| Measure body mass index | 12 weeks | weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2 |
Countries
Egypt