Skip to content

Comparison of Sepsis Prediction Algorithms

Prospective Evaluation of Sepsis Prediction Algorithms in a Multi-Hospital Healthcare System

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05943938
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2023-07-13
Start date
2026-06-30
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis

Keywords

Infection, Emergency Department, Algorithm, Prediction

Brief summary

Sepsis is a severe response to infection resulting in organ dysfunction and often leading to death. More than 1.5 million people get sepsis every year in the U.S., and 270,000 Americans die from sepsis annually. Delays in the diagnosis of sepsis lead to increased mortality. Several clinical decision support algorithms exist for the early identification of sepsis. The research team will compare the performance of three sepsis prediction algorithms to identify the algorithm that is most accurate and clinically actionable. The algorithms will run in the background of the electronic health record (EHR) and the predictions will not be revealed to patients or clinical staff. In this current evaluation study, the algorithms will not affect any part of a patient's care. The algorithms will be deployed across the Emory healthcare system on data from all patients presenting to the emergency department.

Detailed description

The primary goal of this study is to prospectively evaluate three sepsis prediction algorithms that are embedded in the EHR. The models will be deployed in a shadow mode, and the results will not be displayed to the treatment team during this study. Two of the algorithms are proprietary algorithms of the EHR provider (Epic). The third algorithm is an internally developed, open-source algorithm. The algorithms will compute the probability of sepsis at periodic intervals and will continue to run on a patient's data until the patient's discharge, death, or upon initiation of intravenous antibiotics (at which point there is an indirect record of clinical suspicion of an infection).

Interventions

OTHEREmory Sepsis Model

Emory internal algorithm

OTHEREpic Sepsis Model Version - 1

The Epic Sepsis Model (ESM) version 1, a proprietary sepsis prediction model.

OTHEREpic Sepsis Model Version - 2

The Epic Sepsis Model (ESM) version 2, a proprietary sepsis prediction model.

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients admitted through the ED

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient hospitalization-level area under curve (AUC) for identification of sepsis,Duration of hospital stay (until discharge or death), an expected average of 30 daysDefinition of Sepsis using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Adult Sepsis Surveillance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lead time to antibiotic administrationDuration of hospital stay (until discharge or death), an expected average of 30 daysThe time between the initial deployment of the alert in patients confirmed to have sepsis (ture positives) and the physician's ordering of intravenous antibiotic therapy.
Percent expected increase in unnecessary antibioticsDuration of hospital stay (until discharge or death), an expected average of 30 daysPercent of patients who were incorrectly identified as having sepsis (false positives), and received antibiotics.
Number needed to screenDuration of hospital stay (or death), an expected average of 30 daysThe number of alerts that would need to be processed to find one true positive sepsis.
Sensitivity, specificity, and Positive and Negative Predictive Value of algorithmsDuration of hospital stay (until discharge or death), an expected average of 30 daysSensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
Time-horizon based AUCs4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hoursAUCs will be calculated at 3 pre-specified time horizons.
Accuracy and calibration by subgroupDuration of hospital stay (until discharge or death), an expected average of 30 daysThe AUC and calibration curves will be compared by sex and race to ensure predictive accuracy is equal across subgroups.
Number of Total and false alert burdenDuration of hospital stay (until discharge or death), an expected average of 30 daysThe number of Total and false alert burden cumulative across all study patients over the study period

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactSivasubramanium Bhavani, MD
sivasubramanium.bhavani@emory.edu404-712-2970

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026