Skip to content

CICLOPS Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Neurotoxicity: Long-term Outcomes, Predictors, and Survival.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Neurotoxicity: Long-term Outcomes, Predictors, and Survival.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05942872
Acronym
LOPF - NIRAES
Enrollment
90
Registered
2023-07-12
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2021-09-15
Last updated
2023-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paraneoplastic Syndromes

Keywords

ICIs, NirAEs, paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, Neurological toxicity, immune checkpoint inhibitors

Brief summary

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have radically changed the therapy of cancer in recent years. ICIs promote antitumor immune response inhibiting one of the following immune checkpoints: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4; ipilimumab), programmed death-1 (PD-1: pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and cemiplimab), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1: atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab). Despite the desired effect as cancer treatment, ICIs can break immune tolerance to self-antigens and induce specific toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), that may affect both peripheral and central nervous system (Neurological immune mediated adverse events, NirAEs). The pathogenic mechanisms underlying NirAEs are probably heterogeneous, as reflected by the variety of clinical phenotypes and severity. NirAEs are rare, but there is some concern that the incidence may increase in the next future, in particular because ICIs are being used more and more for cancers commonly associated with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (e.g. small-cell lung cancer). Moreover, NirAEs are usually severe, and often fatal. Indeed, irAEs-related complications are the most common cause of death among these patients. On the other hand, these patients usually have a good tumor response to immunotherapy. There is some evidence that irAEs may predict ICIs efficacy and consequently NirAE surivors are likely to have longer life expectancy than non-NirAE patients. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to better characterize the long-term outcomes of NirAE patients in terms of neurologic disability and mortality, and to identify predictors of severe NirAEs. So far, only few studies with sufficient follow-up have been published on the topic, and they included only small number of patients. The aims of our study is to characterize the main clinical and paraclinical features of NirAEs in a large cohort of NirAE patients, to assess long-term outcomes and to identify prognostic factors. This study will help define new guidelines regarding NirAE prediction and management.

Interventions

OTHERThis is a non-interventional study. We will collect clinical data exclusively, and will do so by reviewing all available patients clinical records.

This is a non-interventional study. We will collect clinical data exclusively, and will do so by reviewing all available patients clinical records.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients who developed NirAEs (grade severity equal or more than 3 according to CTCAE)

Exclusion criteria

* alternative better explanation for neurological symptoms (cancer progression, carcinomatous meningitis, complications of other treatments..)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prognostic factors in patients with NirAEsBaseline (onset of NirAE) and 1 year.Evaluation of residual neurological disability as assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0 - No symptoms. 1. \- No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. 2. \- Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. 3. \- Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. 4. \- Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. 5. \- Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. 6. \- Dead.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026