Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Brief summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by a complex interplay of inflammatory demyelination and neuronal damage. The core MS phenotypes defined by clinical course are the relapsing and the progressive forms.Relapsing MS (RMS) is characterized by attacks - also called relapses - defined as new or increasing neurologic dysfunction, followed by periods of partial or complete recovery, without apparent progression of the disease during the periods of remission. In contrast, progressive MS (PMS) is characterized by progressive worsening of neurologic function leading to accumulation of disability over time independent of relapses. Additional descriptors (active/not-active) serve to better characterize the presence of clinical and/or radiological activity both in relapsing and progressive forms. In recent years, the concept of a silent progression, also known as smouldering MS, is making its way into the common lexicon of MS experts, challenging the current definitions of MS phenotypes. A growing body of literature suggests that the line between RMS and PMS is not as marked as men thought, and that inflammation and neurodegeneration can represent a single disease continuum coexisting early on in the disease course. Whilst it is established that relapse-associated worsening (RAW) can be accounted for by an acute inflammatory focal damage leading to axonal transection and conduction block, the physiopathology underlying the progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) remains unclear. It is becoming apparent that there is an increasing need for a personalized therapeutic approach by considering the individual MS phenotype of each patient, thereby enabling the choice of the molecule best suited to counteract the predominant disease pattern of that individual patient. There is a limited number of studies combining clinical scores, neurophysiological evaluation and neuroimaging in patients with MS experiencing PIRA. Integrating a multimodal exploration of these patients might allow a step forward in the early recognition, management, and treatment of disability accumulation independent from relapses in patients with MS.
Interventions
To assess the integrity of visual pathways through the optic nerves to the visual cortex, latencies and amplitudes of P100 will be measured after pattern-reversal stimuli.
To assess the integrity of sensitive pathways through the peripheral nerves and dorsal spinal cord to the somatosensory cortex. For the upper limbs, latencies and amplitudes of N9, N13, P14, N20 and P25 will be measured after median nerve stimulation. For the lower limbs, latency and amplitude of P40 will be measured after tibial nerve stimulation.
DEVICETranscranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (TCmMEP)
To measure the integrity of motor pathways, the central conduction times will be measured for upper and lower limbs through magnetic stimulations of the primary motor cortex and the spinal cord, at cervical and lumbar levels.
DEVICETesla Brain MRI
All patients will undergo a single brain MRI on a 3T scanner. The acquisition protocol will include high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) T2\*-weighted echo-planar imaging and 3D T2-FLAIR images acquired, respectively, during or after intravenous injection of a single dose (0.1mmol/kg) of gadolinium-based contrast material.
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBlood test - Neurofilament light chain (NfL)
\- Neurofilament light chain (NfL) will be tested (Quanterix's Simoa® Technology) in the serum of patients. To evaluate their variation over time, 3 time-point tests will be obtained at 6 months apart (at baseline, at 6- and 12-month follow-up).
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBlood test - EBV serology
EBV serology will be assessed (VCA IgG) in the serum of patients to evaluate the variation of antibody titers over time (at baseline, at 6- and 12-month follow-up), and compare to titers at the time of diagnosis (when available in their medical record).
Sponsors
Brugmann University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients ≥ 18-year-old with diagnosis of RMS according to 2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria 2. Availability in the functional outcome database of at least 3 time-point complete evaluations with a time frame from the first to the last evaluation of minimum 12 months 3. Most recent functional outcome evaluation within 12 months of enrollment 4. Availability of follow-up MRI data during the observational period
Exclusion criteria
a) Contraindication to one or more of the paraclinical tests of the prospective multimodal evaluation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) | Change from baseline to 12 months | To assess the integrity of visual pathways through the optic nerves to the visual cortex. |
| Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) | Change from baseline to 12 months | To assess the integrity of sensitive pathways through the peripheral nerves and dorsal spinal cord to the somatosensory cortex. |
| Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (TCmMEP) | Change from baseline to 12 months | To measure the integrity of motor pathways. |
| Tesla Brain MRI | Baseline | Tesla Brain MRI (descriptive outcome) |
| Neurofilament light chain (NfL) serum levels | Baseline | Neurofilament light chain (NfL) serum levels |
| Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology (VCA IgG) | Baseline | EBV serology will be assessed (VCA IgG) in the serum of patients to evaluate the variation of antibody titers over time (at baseline, at 6- and 12-month follow-up), and compare to titers at the time of diagnosis (when available in their medical record). |
Countries
Belgium
Contacts
Primary ContactVito Tota
Outcome results
None listed