Skip to content

Effects of Vestibular Training on Postural Control of Healthy Adults Using Virtual Reality

Effects of Vestibular Training on Postural Control of Healthy Adults Using Virtual Reality

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05941039
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-07-12
Start date
2022-10-03
Completion date
2025-08-30
Last updated
2025-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Balance Assessment, Vestibular Training, Virtual Reality

Keywords

VR, Balance, Vestibular Training, EMG, EOG

Brief summary

Postural instability is a common symptom of vestibular dysfunction that impacts a person's day-to-day activities. Vestibular rehabilitation is effective in decreasing dizziness, visual symptoms and improving postural control through several mechanisms including sensory reweighting. As part of the sensory reweighting mechanisms, vestibular activation training with headshake activities influence vestibular reflexes. However, combining challenging vestibular and postural tasks to facilitate more effective rehabilitation outcomes is under-utilized. The novel concurrent headshake and weight shift training (Concurrent HS-WST) is purported to train the vestibular system to directly impact the postural control system simultaneously and engage sensory reweighting to improve balance. Young healthy participants will perform the training by donning a virtual reality headset with an overhead harness on and a spotter present to prevent any falls. The investigators propose that this training strategy would show improved outcomes over traditional training methods by improving vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gains, eye movement variability, sensory reweighting and promoting postural balance. The findings of this study may guide clinicians to develop rehabilitation methods for vestibular postural control in neurological populations with vestibular and/or sensorimotor control impairment.

Interventions

A cross-over design will be used with group one receiving the training intervention for 6 days, a 4-day washout period, and a 6-day no-training period.

Group two will follow the reverse sequence.

Sponsors

Temple University
CollaboratorOTHER
Clarkson University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Able to stand independently (without an assistive device) * This study requires participants to perform postural assessments including reactive balance following mechanical perturbations. * Participants will also perform headshake activities and weight shift training in standing for 20 mins will mini breaks. * Participants must be within the age of 18-35. * A power analysis revealed that a sample of 24 participants will required for a two-group comparison to detect a significant difference at alpha=0.05 and 0.30 effect size at beta=0.8 (G\*Power, Version 3.0.10)(Faul et al, 2007).

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with an evidence of: * Concussion, vestibular, balance or oculomotor issues for the prior 6 months. * Neuropathic conditions, particularly affecting the lower extremities. Participants with this issue will have sensory impairments which can affect their sensory assessment. * Current musculoskeletal deficits including significant postural abnormalities (signs of spinal, pelvic and leg length discrepancies). * Pain or limitations in neck range of motion. * Recent (within 6 months) orthopedic surgery that impacts postural training. * Visual Impairment * Participants must be able to see and follow targets on the computer monitor. Therefore, subjects must have 20/50 (corrected) vision. Subjects who are blind cannot participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gainTwo week study periodHorizontal and vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain will be assessed using the video head impulse test (vHIT; ICS, Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark). Twenty head impulses each will be performed to assess each direction of the semicircular canals with participant in a seated position
Eye movement variabilityTwo week study periodHorizontal and vertical eye movements will be assessed during force plate perturbation trials using BlueGain electro-oculography (EOG) device (Cambridge Research Systems). Participants will stand on a force plate perturbation device with EOG electrodes affixed on eye muscles to record eye movements during toes up (simulating being pushed backward) and toes down (simulating being pushed forward) perturbation rotation trials.
Electromyography (EMG) amplitudeTwo week study periodElectromyography (EMG) will be assessed during force plate perturbation trials using Delsys Trigno wireless sensors (Delsys Inc., Boston, MA). Participants will stand on a force plate perturbation device with EMG sensors placed on postural muscles to record electrical activity during toes up (simulating being pushed backward) and toes down (simulating being pushed forward) perturbation rotation trials.
Electromyography (EMG) time onsetTwo week study periodElectromyography (EMG) will be assessed during force plate perturbation trials using Delsys Trigno wireless sensors (Delsys Inc., Boston, MA). Participants will stand on a force plate perturbation device with EMG sensors placed on postural muscles to record electrical activity during toes up (simulating being pushed backward) and toes down (simulating being pushed forward) perturbation rotation trials.
Balance equilibrium and composite scoresTwo week study periodEquilibrium and composite scores will be assessed by the Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction on Balance (MCTSIB; NeuroCom®, Natus Medical Inc., Pleasanton, CA) during quiet stance. The MCTSIB requires the participant to stand upright as stable as possible for 10 s under four different conditions: (1) eyes open (EO) on a stable surface (SS), (2) eyes closed (EC) on SS, (3) EO on foam surface (FS), (4) EC on FS.
Sensory ratiosTwo week study periodSensory ratios will be assessed by the Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction on Balance (MCTSIB; NeuroCom®, Natus Medical Inc., Pleasanton, CA) during quiet stance. The MCTSIB requires the participant to stand upright as stable as possible for 10 s under four different conditions: (1) eyes open (EO) on a stable surface (SS), (2) eyes closed (EC) on SS, (3) EO on foam surface (FS), (4) EC on FS.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactKwadwo Appiah-kubi, PhD
kappiahk@clarkson.edu347-284-9986
Backup ContactEvan Laing, BS
lainge@clarkson.edu518-860-9789

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026