Skip to content

Ultrasound-detectable Endotracheal Tube: a Feasibility Study

Ultrasound-detectable Endotracheal Tube: a Feasibility Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05941013
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-07-12
Start date
2023-11-15
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Catheterization, Endotracheal Tube

Keywords

Ultrasound, Intubation

Brief summary

The researchers are studying whether special features make it easier to see if the breathing tube is in the correct place. It is hoped that the investigational device will enable more accurate placement (depth and trachea vs. esophagus).

Detailed description

The participant will have a breathing tube where the balloon (cuff) at the end of the tube has two special features: 1) The balloon will have a divot in it, rather than be round in shape, and 2) The balloon will be filled with saline (salt water), rather than air. The breathing tube is called an ultrasound detectable cuffed endotracheal tube (USD-ETT). The USD-ETT has not been tested or used in humans previously.

Interventions

DEVICEUltrasound detectable cuffed endotracheal tube (USD-ETT)

Intubation with a novel ultrasound-detectable endotracheal tube

Sponsors

John R. Charpie
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The outcomes assessor is "blinded" for outcome measure 4. Specifically the protocol says, "After each case is completed, the fluoroscopic images and ultrasound images will be interpreted by independent study team members who are blinded to the results of the other test."

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 42 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is undergoing scheduled or planned diagnostic or interventional cardiac catheterization with planned general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient has a known airway abnormality, including tracheal stenosis, previous tracheal stenosis, or tracheobronchomalacia. * Patient has a tracheostomy. * Patient is ventilator-dependent. * Patient has an anticipated difficult intubation based upon airway exam and/or history of difficult intubation. * Patient is unlikely (in opinion of anesthesia team) or is unable to be intubated with 3.5 mm, 4.0 mm, or 4.5 mm Inner Diameter USD-ETT due to the size of the patient or their airway. * Patient is already intubated prior to the scheduled procedure. * It is anticipated that the patient will not be extubated after the catheterization procedure. * Concurrent enrollment in another clinical trial with an intervention during the cardiac catheterization procedure or 30 days afterwards. * Allergy to plastic/materials in USD-ETT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of the USD-ETTs visualized by ultrasoundWithin 5 minutes of placing the ultrasound probe at the suprasternal notch after intubationReported as a 'yes' or 'no' - this outcome simply seeks to verify if the ultrasound can detect the ultrasound detectable cuffed endotracheal tube. The outcome measure assesses if the device is detectable as designed. It does not assess health related information.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events that could be related to the USD-ETT deviceUp to 30 days post intubation
Safely support ventilation and oxygenation of the patient during the procedureImmediately following extubationAssessed by the question: "Were there any desaturation events, inability to property ventilate the patient or, blood gas abnormalities, that could be attributable to the ETT?" will be described
Kappa agreement between placement location of USD-ETT as assessed by ultrasound and fluoroscopyApproximately 5 minutes after of placing the ultrasound probe at the suprasternal notch after intubationUltrasound location data compared to fluoroscopy location data using a weighted Kappa statistic

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTCynthia Smith, RN
csmithw@med.umich.edu734-615-0590
CONTACTAndrea Les, PhD
asles@med.umich.edu734-998-5585
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJohn Charpie, MD, PhD

University of Michigan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026